The Global Insect Pest Control Market is growing at an exciting pace driven by changing dynamics and risk ecosystem, a study of which forms the crux of the report. The study on the global Insect Pest Control market takes a closer look at several regional trends and the emerging regulatory landscape to assess its prospects. The critical assessment of the numerous growth factors and breaks in the global Insect Pest Control market offered in the analyses helps in assessing the lucrativeness of its key segments.

Download Free PDF Brochure for Latest Research Study of Insect Pest Control Market:: https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/agriculture/global-insect-pest-control-industry-market-research-report/6520 #request_sample

This Report Covers Leading Companies Associated in Worldwide Market:

Rentokil Initial plc.FMC CorporationSyngenta AGArrow Exterminators Inc.Ecolab, Inc.Bayer AGBASF SEThe Terminix International Company LPBell Laboratories Inc.Rollins, Inc.

Summary of Market: The global Insect Pest Control market is valued at xx million US$ in 2019 is expected to touch xx million US$ by the close of 2026, growing at a CAGR of xx% during 2020-2026.

The report emphases on Insect Pest Control Market volume and value at Global Level, Regional Level And Company Level. From a global standpoint, this report embodies overall market size by studying historical data and future outlook.

The report is bifurcated into product type, applications, and regions worldwide. The above areas are further bifurcated into country-level data statistics for the below countries.

The key regions and countries covered in this report are:

Please note, the regional and country level data can be altered and provided as per clients custom requirements.

Global Insect Pest Control Market Segmentation, By Product Type:

ChemicalPhysical & mechanicalBiologicalOther methods (Environment control services and radiation)

Global Insect Pest Control Market Segmentation, By Application:Commercial & industrialResidentialLivestock farmsOthers (Post-harvest applications and transportation)

Inquire Before Buying: https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/agriculture/global-insect-pest-control-industry-market-research-report/6520 #inquiry_before_buying

Research objectives:

To study and estimate the market size of Insect Pest Control , in terms of value.

To find development and challenges for the global market.

To observe worthwhile expansions including expansions, new services presents in worldwide industry.

To classify and assess the side view of important companies of Global Insect Pest Control industry.

Key Questions Answered in the Report:

How is the Insect Pest Control market expected to Grow In Terms Of Value during the study period?

What are the Competition Developments and Trends in the Insect Pest Control market?

What are the core Macro-Economic and Industry Factors impacting the growth of the Insect Pest Control market?

What are the Key Challenges, Opportunities, and Improvements faced by market players in the global Insect Pest Control market?

Table of Content

1 Report Outline

1.1 Research Opportunity

1.2 Major Industrialists

1.3 Market Segment by Type

1.4 Market Segment by Application

1.5 Study Objectives

1.6 Years Considered

2 Global Evolution Trends

2.1 Production and Volume Analysis

2.1.1 Global Insect Pest Control Production Value 2015-1406

2.1.2 Global Insect Pest Control Production 2015-2026.

2.1.3 Global Insect Pest Control Capacity 2015-2026.

2.1.4 Global Insect Pest Control Marketing Pricing and Trends

2.2 Major Producers Growth Rate (CAGR) 2020-2026.

2.2.1 Global Insect Pest Control Market Size CAGR of Major Regions

2.2.2 Global Insect Pest Control Market Share of Major Regions

2.3 Industry Trends

2.3.1 Market Top Trends

2.3.2 Market Operators

3 Market Share by Industrialists

3.1 Capacity and Production by Industrialists

3.1.1 Global,Insect Pest Control Capacity by Industrialists

3.1.2 Global Insect Pest Control Production by Industrialists

3.2 Revenue by Industrialists

3.2.1. Insect Pest Control Revenue by Industrialists (2015-2020)

3.2.2. Insect Pest Control Revenue Share by Industrialists (2015-2020)

3.2.3 Global Insect Pest Control Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)

3.3. Insect Pest Control Price by Industrialists

3.4 Major Industrialists of Insect Pest Control Plants/Factories Distribution and Area Served

3.5 Date of Major Industrialists Enter into Insect Pest Control Market

3.6 Major Industrialists Insect Pest Control Product Offered

3.7 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 Market Dimensions by Type

4.1 Production and Production Rate for Each Type

4.2 Global Insect Pest Control Production Market Share by Type

4.3 Global Insect Pest Control Production Value Market Share by Type

4.4. Insect Pest Control Ex-factory Price by Type

5 Market Size by Application

5.1 Overview

5.2 Global Insect Pest Control Consumption by Application

6 Production by Regions

6.1 Global Insect Pest Control Production (History Data) by Regions 2015-2020.

6.2 Global Insect Pest Control Production Value (History Data) by Regions

6.3 North America

6.3.1 North America Production Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.3.2 North America Production Value Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.3.3 Major Players in North America

6.3.4 North America Import & Export

6.4 Europe

6.4.1 Europe Production Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.4.2 Europe Production Value Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.4.3 Major Players in Europe

6.4.4 Europe Import & Export

6.5 China

6.5.1 China Production Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.5.2 China Production Value Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.5.3 Major Players in China

6.5.4 China Import & Export

6.6 Japan

6.6.1 Japan Production Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.6.2 Japan Production Value Growth Rate 2015-2020.

6.6.3 Major Players in Japan

6.6.4 Japan Import & Export

7. Insect Pest Control Consumption by Regions

7.1 Global Insect Pest Control Consumption (History Data) by Regions

7.2 North America

7.2.1 North America Consumption by Type

7.2.2 North America Consumption by Application

7.2.3 North America Consumption by Countries

7.2.4 United States

7.2.5 Canada

7.2.6 Mexico

7.3 Europe

7.3.1 Europe Consumption by Type

7.3.2 Europe Consumption by Application

7.3.3 Europe Consumption by Countries

See original here:
Insect Pest Control Market Bring Opportunities and Challenges with Profiling Key Players Bayer AG, BASF SE, The Terminix International Company LP. -...

Los Angeles, United State, January 23rd ,2020:

The report titled, Global Mosquito Control Service Market has been recently published by QY Research.The report has offered exhaustive analysis of the global Mosquito Control Service market taking into consideration all the crucial aspects like growth factors, constraints, market developments, future prospects, and trends. At the start, the report lays emphasis on the key trends and opportunities that may emerge in the near future and positively impact the overall industry growth. Key drivers that are fuelling the growth are also discussed in the report. Additionally, challenges and restraining factors that are likely to curb the growth in the years to come are put forth by the analysts to prepare the manufacturers for future challenges in advance.

Download PDF template of this report: https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1437922/global-mosquito-control-service-market

Key companies functioning in the global Mosquito Control Service market cited in the report:

Rentokil InitialMosquito SquadRollinsEcolabClarkeTerminixLawn DoctorMassey ServicesMosquito ShieldMosquito JoeMosquito AuthorityArrow ExterminatorsPoulins Pest ControlAnticimexTurner Pest ControlIKARI SHODOKUMosquito Control Service Breakdown Data by TypeChemical control serviceMechanical control serviceOthersMosquito Control Service Breakdown Data by ApplicationGovernmentCommercialResidential

The report has focused on the strategic initiatives ta ken up by the competitors to acquire a major share in the global Mosquito Control Service market. This section can prove to be beneficial for the market players to understand the competitive scenario and devise new strategies with an aim to improve their sales as well as profit margins.

Global Mosquito Control Service Market: Segment Analysis

To broaden the understanding of the reader, the report has also studied the segments including product type, application, and end user of the global Mosquito Control Service market in a comprehensive manner. Apart from that, the market professionals have laid emphasis on the key regional markets and their respective countries having growth potential.

Request for Customization @ https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1437922/global-mosquito-control-service-market

Global Mosquito Control Service Market: Regional Analysis

Furthermore, to broaden the understanding, researchers have studied the global Mosquito Control Service market from a geographical point of view, considering the potential regions and countries. The regional analysis will assist the market players in taking sound decisions regarding their future investments.

Get Complete Global Mosquito Control Service Market Report in your Inbox within 24 hours at USD 3,900 :

https://www.qyresearch.com/settlement/pre/145360ed2a0ba670e4e004e5d8c0fed7,0,1,Global-Mosquito-Control-Service-Market-Size-Status-and-Forecast

What the Report has to Offer?

About Us :

The report is a perfect example of a detailed and meticulously prepared research study on the global Mosquito Control Service market. It can be customized as per the requirements of the client. It not only caters to market players but also stakeholders and key decision makers looking for extensive research and analysis on the global Mosquito Control Service market.

Continue reading here:
Global Mosquito Control Service Market 2020 : How much will be the total production? - Vital News 24

Global Inspect Pest Control Market Projected to Witness Robust Development by 2020 2026

According to a recent analysis, A Global Inspect Pest Control market report provides in-depth unique Insights with Size, Share, Trends, Scope, Growth, Manufacturers, Suppliers, Distributors, Traders, Customers, Investors and Major Types as well as Applications and Forecast Period (2020 2026). The report covers in-depth description, competitive scenario, wide product portfolio of key vendors and business strategy adopted by competitors along with their SWOT analysis, revenue, sales, and tactical decision-making.

A Inspect Pest Control is a specifically allows you to focus extremely close to a subject so that it appears large in the viewfinder (and in the conclusive concept). Also, The industry is a high-technology and high-profit industry, the research team maintains a very optimistic outlook. It is suggested that new enterprises enter the field.

We direct to understand this industry now is close to developing, and the consumption increasing size will show a continuous curve. Moreover, On product values the potential trend in recent years will maintain in the future, as competition increases, prices gap between different brands will go narrowing. Similarly, there will be fluctuation in gross margin.

Accordingly, this report over the next five years, the Inspect Pest Control market will register an xx% CAGR in terms of revenue, the global market size will reach US$ xx million by 2026, from US$ xx million in 2020. In particular, this report presents the global market share (sales and revenue) of key companies in the Inspect Pest Control business.

This Report will help you to understand the Volume, growth with Impacting Trends. Click HERE To get SAMPLE PDF (Including Full TOC, Table & Figures)@ https://market.biz/report/global-united-states-european-union-and-china-inspect-pest-control-market-qy/432221/#requestforsample

Top Manufacturers Listed in the Inspect Pest Control Market Report are:

BayerAdamaRollinsFMCEcolabArrow ExterminatorsBASFEnsystexTerminixSyngentaSumitomo ChemicalRentokil InitialBizLinkAmphenolNexansHansenKintronic LaboratoriesBelden

By the product type, the Inspect Pest Control market is primarily split into:

Physical Control MethodsChemical Control MethodsBiological Control Methods Control Methods

By the end-users/application, Inspect Pest Control market report covers the following segments:

Livestock FarmsCommercial & IndustrialResidential Applications

Inquire for further detailed information of Inspect Pest Control Market Report: https://market.biz/report/global-united-states-european-union-and-china-inspect-pest-control-market-qy/432221/#inquiry

Analytical insights enclosed in the report:

Raw material suppliers, traders, manufacturers, equipment/service providers in the Inspect Pest Control Market.

Market entry opportunities for potential market players.

Revenue and pricing analysis of established market players in the Inspect Pest Control Market.

Pipeline and ongoing research and development projects.

Sales and promotional strategies adopted by various market players.

Further, The report splits the Inspect Pest Control Market into different market segments including, region, end-use, and application.

Explore More Trending Research Reports:

Global Stepper Motor Controller Market 2020 Research Methodology

More here:
Global Inspect Pest Control Market Share Growing Rapidly with Recent Trends, Revenue and Forecast to 2026 - Neptune Pine

Monadnock Ledger-Transcript

Published: 1/22/2020 3:30:28 PM

Dave Estey turns over a branch of evergreen needles while walking on the snowmobile trail behind the Wilton Reservoir. Underneath, so small they are only apparent upon a close look, are small, white dots.

There it is, Estey said.

The it ishemlock woolly adelgid, an east Asian insect thats become a troublesome invasive species in the United States. It only impacts hemlock trees, but once it has taken hold on a specimen, it can completely kill the tree.

The aphid-like insect covers itself in a white, waxy substance that gives it its name, and will spend almost all its lifecycle in one place, only moving right after hatching to find a suitable feeding spot, and then attachingto the hemlock tree feeding on the sap at the base of the needles. This eventually kills the needles, and without the needles, the tree itself starves to death.

Estey, who only lives a short distance from the reservoir, said he first noticed a few trees with the infestation while walking his dog in the area.

Im always looking at the trees and keeping an eye out for things I know are a problem, he said. Finding it that close means Im going to have it [near my home] soon.

The woolly adelgid looks like tiny cotton puffs, no larger than one-sixteenth of an inch, clustered along the bottom of hemlock branches.

Hunter said he hasnt seen the trees around the reservoir that have been impacted, but hes aware the woolly adelgid is in Wilton, having found it on trees in the towns conserved Heald Tract.

Theyre very significant, because they kill the trees they infest, Wilton Conservation Commission Chair Bart Hunter. There are very few treatments for it, and what treatments there are wouldnt work well on acres and acres of hemlock.

While there are spray treatments to deal with the pest, Hunter said, treating large amounts of trees is expensive, and usually the solution becomes to cut down the infested tree.

The pest is not a new phenomenon in New England. The woolly adelgid was first found in the United States in the 1920s, it has mainly been found in New England and the mid-Atlantic states. It was first found in New Hampshire in the year 2000 in Portsmouth. Today, infestations have been recorded in more than half the towns in the state, and in nearly every county.

Hemlock is a commercial wood, though not as popular as other conifers such as pine and spruce, and its bark is a common landscaping mulch. It also has value as a food source for wildlife who eat the seeds dispersed from its cones, and as habitat, because hemlock stands tend to grow thickly together. They also are associated with erosion control.

If you lost the hemlock, youd lose a significant and important tree, Hunter said.

TheN.H. Division of Forests and Lands has been tracking woolly adelgid infestations and has written an action plan for addressing the issue. For more information, visitwww.nh.gov/nhdfl/.

All possible sightings of suspect infestations in uninfested counties must be reported to the Forest Health Program at 464-3016. Infestations in already infested counties should also be made to the Forest Health Program in order to track the spread. Infested nursery stock should be reported to the Division of Plant Industry at 271-2561.

Follow this link:
Invasive bug threatens Wilton hemlocks - Monadnock Ledger Transcript

In September 2009, over 3,000 bee enthusiasts from around the world descended on the city of Montpellier in southern France for Apimondia a festive beekeeper conference filled with scientific lectures,hobbyist demonstrations, and commercial beekeepers hawking honey. But that year, a cloud loomed over the event: bee colonies across the globe were collapsing, and billions of bees were dying.

Bee declines have been observed throughout recorded history, but the sudden, persistent and abnormally high annual hive losses had gotten so bad that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had commissioned two of the worlds most well-known entomologists Dennis vanEngelsdorp, a chief apiary inspector in Pennsylvania, then studying at Penn State University, and Jeffrey Pettis, then working as a government scientist to study the mysterious decline. They posited that there must be an underlying factor weakening bees immune systems.

We exposed whole colonies to very low levels of neonicotinoids in this case, and then challenged bees from those colonies with Nosema, a pathogen, a gut pathogen, said Pettis, speaking to filmmaker Mark Daniels in his documentary,The Strange Disappearance of the Bees, at Apimondia. And we saw an increase, even if we fed the pesticide at very low levels an increase in Nosema levels in direct response to the low-level feeding of neonicotinoids.

The dosages of the pesticide were so miniscule, said vanEngelsdorp, that it was below the limit of detection. The only reason they knew the bees had consumed the neonicotinoids, he added, was because we exposed them.

Bee health depends on a variety of synergistic factors, the scientists were careful to note. But in this study, Pettis said, they were able to isolate one pesticide and one pathogen and we clearly see the interaction.

The evidence was mounting. Shortly after vanEngelsdorp and Pettis revealed their findings, a number of French researchers produced a nearly identical study, feeding minute amounts of the same pesticide to bees, along with a control group. The study produced results that echoed what the Americans had found.

Drifting clouds of neonicotinoid dust from planting operations caused a series of massive bee die-offs in northern Italy and the Baden-Wrttemberg region of Germany. Studies have shown neonicotinoids impaired bees ability to navigate and forage for food, weakened bee colonies, and made them prone to infestation by parasitic mites.

In 2013, the European Union called for a temporary suspension of the most commonly used neonicotinoid-based products on flowering plants, citing the danger posed to bees an effort that resulted in a permanent ban in 2018.

In the U.S., however, industry dug in, seeking not only to discredit the research but to castpesticide companies as a solution to the problem. Lobbying documents and emails, many of which were obtained through open records requests, show a sophisticated effort over the last decade by the pesticide industry to obstruct any effort to restrict the use of neonicotinoids. Bayer and Syngenta, the largest manufacturers of neonics, and Monsanto, one of the leading producers of seeds pretreated with neonics, cultivated ties with prominent academics, including vanEngelsdorp, and other scientists who had once called for a greater focus on the threat posed by pesticides.

Syngenta AGs headquarters in Basel, Switzerland, on Feb. 4, 2015.

Photo: Philipp Schmidli/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The companies also sought influence with beekeepers and regulators, and went to great lengths to shape public opinion. Pesticide firms launched new coalitions and seeded foundations with cash to focus on nonpesticide factors in pollinator decline.

Position the industry as an active promoter of bee health, and advance best management practices which emphasize bee safety, noted aninternal planning memo from CropLife America, the lobby group for the largest pesticide companies in America, including Bayer and Syngenta. The ultimate goal of the bee health project, the document noted, was to ensure that member companies maintained market access for neonic products and other systemic pesticides.

The planning memo, helmed in part by Syngenta regulatory official John Abbott, charts a variety of strategies for advancing the pesticide industrys interests, such as, Challenge EPA on the size and breadth of the pollinator testing program. CropLife America officials were also tapped to proactively shape the conversation in the new media realm with respect to pollinators and minimize negative association of crop protection products with effects on pollinators. The document, dated June 2014, calls for outreach to university researchers who could be independent validators.

The pesticide companies have used a variety of strategies to shift the public discourse.

Americas Heartland, a PBS series shown on affiliates throughout the country and underwritten by CropLife America, portrayed the pollinator declines as a mystery. One segment from early 2013 on the crisis made no mention of pesticides, with the host simply declaring that experts arent sure why bees and butterflies were disappearing.

Another segment,released in January2015, quickly mentions pesticides as one of many possible factors for honeybee deaths. A representative of the North American Bee Care Program, Becky Langer, appeared on the program to discuss the exotic pests that can affect the bees. The program does not mention Langers position as a spokesperson for Bayer focused on managing fallout from the bee controversy.

Michael Sanford, a spokesperson for PBS KVIE, which produces Americas Heartland, wrote in an email to The Intercept that consistent with strict PBS editorial standards and our own, sponsors of the show provided no editorial input.

Bayers advocacy, designed to position the firm as a leader in protecting bee health, included a roadshow around the country, in which Bayer officials handed out oversized ceremonial checks to local beekeepers and students. The firm hosts splashy websites touting its leadership in promoting bee health and sponsors a number of beekeeping associations.

Meanwhile, Bayer has financed a series of online advertisements that depict individuals who fear that its pesticide products harm nontarget insects as deranged conspiracy theorists.

Honeybees have captured almost all the attention for the dangers of neonics, but they are hardly the only species in decline because of the chemical.

Other forms of influence have been far more covert.

Communications staff with CropLife America compiled a list of terms to shape on search engine results, including neonicotinoid, pollinators, and neonics. One of the consulting firms tapped to coordinate the industrys outreach, Paradigm Communications, a subsidiary of the public relations giant Porter Novelli, helped lead the effort to shift how pesticide products were portrayed in search engine results.

A slide prepared by Paradigm Communications showcases its push to decoupleGoogle search results for bee decline with neonic pesticides.

The greatest public relations coup has been the push to reframe the debate around bee decline to focus only on the threat of Varroa mites, a parasite native to Asia that began spreading to the U.S. in the 1980s. The mite is known to rapidly infest bee hives and carry a range of infectious diseases.

CropLife America, among other groups backed by pesticide companies, has financed research and advocacy around the mite an effort designed to muddy the conversation around pesticide use. Meanwhile, research suggests the issues are interrelated; neonics make bees far more susceptible to mite infestations and attendant diseases.

Bayer even constructed a sculpture of the Varroa mite at its Bee Care Center in North Carolina and at its research center in Germany, hyping its role as the primary force fueling the decline of pollinators.

A model of honeybee with a Varroa mite on its back at Bayers Bee Care Center in Monheim am Rhein, Germany, on Nov. 19, 2013.

Photo: Joanna Nottebrock/The New York Times via Redux

The stunningly successful campaign has kept most neonic products in wide circulation in commercial agriculture as well as in home gardens. The result is a world awash in neonics and massive profits for companies such as Syngenta and Bayer, which now counts Monsanto as a subsidiary.

Millions of pounds of the chemical are applied to 140 commercial crops every year. In the U.S., nearly all field-planted corn and two-thirds of soybean use neonic-coated seeds. The chemical is found in soil samples from coast to coast, in waterways and in drinking water. Neonics, which are water soluble, have been detected in the American River in California, the River Waveney in England, tap water in Iowa City, and hundreds of other streams and rivers across the world. In Brazil last year, after President Jair Bolsonaros government approved dozens of new pesticides, the use of neonics caused the death of more than 500 million bees across the country.

In August, a study publishing in peer-reviewed journal PLOS One found that the American landscape has become 48 times more toxic to insects since the 1990s, a shift largely fueled by the rising application of neonics.

Honeybees have captured almost all the attention for the dangers of neonics, but they are hardly the only species in decline because of the chemical. Studies have tied neonics to the disappearance of native bees, butterflies, mayflies, dragonflies, amphipods, and a range of waterborne insects, as well as earthworms and other insect invertebrates. Several species of bumblebees in the U.S. and Europe are approaching extinction, a die-off researchers say is tied to the use of neonics and other pesticides.

In September, a study released in the academic journal Science revealed that migrating songbirds suffered immediate weight loss following the consumption of only one or two seeds treated with neonics. Previous research had linked disappearing insect life to dwindling food sources for birds in the Netherlands, but the Science study provided the evidence that bird species were directly affected by the chemical.

Another groundbreaking study published in NaturesScientific Reportsshowed that neonics are likely causing serious birth defects in white-tailed deer, the first time research has shown that the chemical compound could endanger large mammals.

Bees are the canary in the cornfield, said Lisa Archer,from Friends of the Earth. The science linking pesticides to the extinction crisis has grown.

Scientists are only now taking a closer look at the potential impact of neonics on humans and other mammals.

Bees are the canary in the cornfield, said Lisa Archer, the food and agriculture program director at Friends of the Earth. The science linking pesticides to the extinction crisis has grown.

Dave Goulson, a professor of biology at the University of Sussex, told The Intercept, I think perhaps we are reaching a tipping point where people finally begin to appreciate the importance of insects, the scale of their decline, and that blitzing the landscape with pesticides is not sustainable or desirable.

Bayer and Syngenta reject any claim that their neonic products are harming the environment.

Neonicotinoid products are critically important tools for farmers, and are approved for use in more than 100 countries due to their strong safety profile when used according to label, said Susan Luke, a spokesperson for Bayer Crop Science North America, in a statement to The Intercept. This is why Bayer continues to strongly support their continued safe use, even though the manufacture of neonic products is not a major part of our business.

Research claims that have been made questioning neonic safety all share common flaws, such as exposure levels that far exceed real-world scenarios, and the flawed idea that exposure to substances in the environment necessarily means harm,adds Luke. It does not, otherwise no one would go swimming in chlorine or drink caffeinated coffee.

Since neonicotinoids were introduced in the 1990s, honey bee colonies have been increasing in the United States, Europe, Canada and indeed around the world, Chris Tutino, a spokesperson for Syngenta, claimed in a statement to The Intercept. He added that most scientists and bee experts agree that bee health is affected by multiple factors, including parasites, diseases, habitat and nutrition, weather and hive management practices.

Tutino, in his email, noted that the neonic compound thiamethoxam, used in popular Syngenta products such as Cruiser and Dividend, had undergone extensive tests evaluating effects on pollinators, and provided links to five studies, all of which were produced by Syngenta consultants or employees.

Neither company responded directly to questions about the role of neonic products in fueling declines of butterflies, dragonflies, and other insect species beyond bee populations. Both companies highlighted company funding for honeybee health research.

The chemical industrys comments were disputed by Willa Childress, an organizer with Pesticide Action Network North America.While its true, Childress noted, that managed honeybee hive populations are growing, that is because of the commercial value of honeybees in pollinating a vast array of American agriculture. Beekeepers on average now lose around40-50 percent of hives every year, wellup from historical averages of10 percent. Many commercial beekeepers are forced to constantly divide hives and buy queens to maintain hive populations, with many relying on government subsidies to scrape by.So no, honeybees arent doing better than ever, said Childress. And the scientists do agree that multiple interacting factors are driving pollinator decline, including, as chemical companies neglect to mention, pesticide use.Honeybees will not go extinct in our lifetimes, noted Childress. But, she added, data on native bees and wild pollinators is far more apocalyptic than even the most concerning reports on honey bee losses. Unprecedented numbers of wild pollinators are facing extinction and we have very limited data on a number of other pollinators that are at risk.

Not long ago, action in the U.S. to restrict neonics seemed imminent.

The pressure began to build in 2010 after Tom Theobald, a beekeeper in Boulder, Colorado, obtained an internal Environmental Protection Agency report showing that the agencys own scientists had sharply criticized the research used to permit the sale of one of the most popular lines of neonic products.

In 2003, Bayer had secured the temporary right to use clothianidin, a neonic used widely for corn and canola, from the EPA under the condition that the company conduct a chronic life cycle study showing how use of the neonic would affect honeybees by the end of the following year.

The Bayer-funded study, led by Cynthia Scott-Dupree, an environmental sciences professor at the University of Guelph in Ontario, placed hives in clothianidin-treated fields of canola and hives in untreated fields of canola. The tests found little variation between the two sets of hives, but researchers later pointed out that the hives in the study were placed only 968 feet apart from one another. Honeybees forage for pollen up to six miles from their hives.

Scott-Dupree was later appointed the Bayer CropScience Chair in Sustainable Pest Management at the University of Guelph. Regulators in Canada and at the EPA used the study to clear clothianidin for unconditional use. Internally, however, EPA scientists expressed concerns.

The memo, written by two EPA scientists, noted that the previous Bayer-funded study failed baseline guidelines for pesticide research and warned that clothianidin posed a major risk concern to nontarget insects (that is, honey bees).

A dizzying array of research began pointing to problems with neonics. Despite claims that the compound represents a form of precision agriculture, a growing body of research shows that the chemical strays far from targetedcrops, often traveling with the wind during planting operations, remaining in the soil for long periods of time, leaching into waterways, and causing acute problems for a wide variety of insect and animal life.

In 2014, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, a Democrat from Oregon, introduced legislation to compel the EPA to take steps to suspend the pesticides. That year, in response to growing controversies around bee decline and the demands for greater accountability over loosely regulated pesticide use, President Barack Obama issued an executive memorandum calling attention to the significant loss of pollinators, including honey bees, native bees, birds, bats, and butterflies.

Activists picketed the White House demanding action. Beekeepers and environmentalist groups filed lawsuits challenging the registration status of major neonic products, claiming that EPA had violated its own protocols when licensing products from Bayer and Syngenta. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced a decision to phase out neonics in wildlife refuge areas in the Pacific region.

Around the country, legislators in states across the country proposed bills to restrict neonics. In Minnesota, a bill was signed into law to prevent nurseries from marketing plants as pollinator-friendly if they had been treated with neonics.

For a while, the movement seemed to be gaining traction, which some hoped would lead the U.S. to mirror the EU in moving to regulate the widely used insecticide.

In the end, little changed. The settlements related to the lawsuits removed small-market neonics. The private-public partnerships that grew out of the Obama memorandum lacked any enforcement mechanism to restrict neonic use in agriculture. President Donald Trump rescinded the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule. Minnesota legislators quickly repealed the labeling requirement a year after it was passed.

Aftera hearing in which he pointed to pesticides, Jeffrey Pettistoldthe Washington Post that hewas criticized him for failing to follow the script.

In almost every other state, with the exception of Vermont, Connecticut, and Maryland, lobbyists from the pesticideand agribusiness industrysuccessfully killed any significant restriction on neonic products. The scientific community, once focused on studying the impact of pesticides, became splintered, with many of the leading voices going to work for industry or industry-backed nonprofits.

Critics of neonics were quickly sidelined. In April 2014, the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Horticulture, Research, Biotechnology, and Foreign Agriculture then chaired by Rep. Austin Scott, a Georgia Republican convened a hearing to discuss the pollinator crisis. The event featured David Fischer, a Bayer official, and Jeff Stone, lobbyist for commercial nurseries. Both men used the hearing to warn against any restrictionson neonics in response to bee decline. The third, Dan Cummings, a representative of the Almond Board, a trade group for almond growers, focused on the threat of the Varroa mite.

A fourth witness, the Department of Agriculture researcher Jeffrey Pettis thescientist who had collaborated with vanEngelsdorp noted that unlike traditional pesticides, neonics are found in pollen, increasing exposure to bees. Under questioning from Scott, the committee chair, Pettis reiterated that even without mites, bees would still be in decline, and pesticides raise concern to a new level.

After the hearing, Pettis told the Washington Post that he spoke privately with Scott, who criticized him for failing to follow the script.

CropLife America, notably, celebrated the hearing performance for its heavy focus on nonpesticide-related factors for bee decline. One thing that we hope was made clear during the hearing was the crop protection industrys commitment to addressing this issue, Jay Vroom, then the president of CropLife America, said in astatement.

Campaign finance records show that CropLife America, just weeks after the hearing, gave$3,500 to Scott, who then sponsored legislation to solve the bee crisis through exemptions to expedite the approval of pesticides used to control the Varroa mite.

And two months after the hearing, according to the Post, Pettis was demoted, losing his role managing the USDA bee lab in Beltsville, Maryland. Pettis later left the government and now serves as president of Apimondia.

Entomologist Jonathan Lundgren, who is researching answers for what might be causing the dwindling honeybee population, on Jan. 9, 2016.Photos: Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post/Getty Images

The Post also details the story of a prominent USDA scientist, Jonathan Lundgren, who researched the dangers posed by neonics to pollinators and spoke publicly about the issue. In 2015, Lundgren suddenly faced suspensions and an internal government investigation over misconduct, a push he believes was motivated by industry for his role in speaking out on pesticides.

I guess I started asking the wrong questions, pursuing risk assessments of neonicotinoids on a lot of different field crop seeds used throughout the U.S. and how they were affecting non-target species like pollinators, Lundgren told The Intercept.

The USDA did not respond to The Intercepts request for comment. It told the Post that the suspensions had nothing to do with his research. They were for conduct unbecoming a federal employee and violating travel regulations.

Lundgren now runs Blue Dasher Farm in South Dakota, a research effort to develop ways to rotate diverse sets of crops as a way to increase yields and suppress pests naturally. There are few institutions, he noted, where researchers can pursue science independent of industry influence. Universities have become dependent on extramural funds, entire programs are bankrolled by these pesticide companies, chemical companies,headded.

The regulatory system in the U.S. assumes chemical products are generally safe until proven hazardous.

Generally, we see the U.S. waiting longer than the EU to take action on a variety of pesticides and other chemicals,said Childress,the organizer with Pesticide Action Network North America. Part of the divergence, Childress continued, stems from a regulatory system in the U.S. that assumes chemical products are generally safe until proven hazardous. In contrast, the EU tends to use the precautionary principle, removing products that may cause harm, and requiring proof of safety before allowing them to return to market.

Another major factor, Childress noted, is the widespread corporate capture of American regulatory institutions. The EPA, for instance, employs 11 former lobbyists including its administrator, Andrew Wheeler, who previously worked for coal interests in opposition to climate regulationsin senior positions.

The pesticide industry also maintains a long history of underhanded methods to discredit its critics.

Monsanto deployed aggressive tactics to punish critics of Roundup, the most widely used herbicide in the world and the companys marquee product over the last several decades. Emails released through ongoing litigation in California last year showed that the firm used its lobbyists to orchestrate a campaignin Congress to criticize and defund scientists with the World Health Organizations cancer research affiliate, after that body had declared that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is a probable carcinogen. Many of the documents detailing Monsantos role in shaping the public discourse around glyphosate were released during the course of class-action lawsuits filed by cancer victims whoblame the company for their illnesses.

Syngenta became infamous after its tactics against University of California, Berkeley Professor Tyrone Hayes were reported. Hayess research showed that the companys signature herbicide, atrazine, appeared to disrupt the sexual development of frogs.

The company dispatched people to follow and record Hayes at public speaking events, commissioned a psychological profile of the professor, and worked with a variety of writers to smear Hayes as non-credible and a liability to academics who considered working with him. The effort to sideline Hayes and his research, which included coordination with industry-friendly academics, was revealed in a series of court documents that were disclosed over litigation involving claims that Syngenta had polluted local water sources with atrazine.

In the two lawsuits against Syngenta and Monsanto, subpoenaed documents revealed that both Syngenta and Monsanto maintain a list of third party stakeholders, including free market think tanks and scientists the industry could turn to for messaging support.

Many of the think tanks and individuals included in the roster now play a prominent role in the neonic debate. The American Council on Health and Science, which has relied on corporate funding from Monsanto, Bayer, and Syngenta, has published overa dozen articles disputing the dangers posed by neonics.

In one email revealed through the Monsanto-Roundup litigation, Daniel Goldstein, a Monsanto official, wrote to colleagues in all-caps to support the councils work: I can assure you I am not all starry eyed about ACSH- they have PLENTY of warts- but: You WILL NOT GET A BETTER VALUE FOR YOUR DOLLAR than ACSH. The bottom of the email included hyperlinks to articles criticizing demands to regulate both glyphosate and neonic pesticides.

The Heartland Institute, one of the think tanks in Syngentas third-party stakeholder list, which has received Bayer donations in the past, has published articles deriding research critical of neonics as junk science.

The pesticide industry is using Big Tobaccos PR tactics to try and spin the science about their products links to bee declines and delay action while they keep profiting, said Archer, whose group, Friends of the Earth, has documented the lobbying tactics of pesticide makers.

When neonics hit the market three decades ago, they were the first new class of insecticide invented in nearly 50 years, and their use skyrocketed.

As early as the late 17th century, farmers found that they could grind tobacco plants and use nicotine extract to kill beetles on crops. Nicotine acts as an organic insecticide, binding to nerve receptors and causing paralysis and death in aphids, white flies, and other plant-eating insects.

Attempts to use nicotine for a mass-market pesticide, however, frustrated scientists. In early research, sunlight diluted the effectiveness of nicotine-based products. But that changed just over three decades ago, when Bayer scientists at Nihon Bayer Agrochem, the firms Japanese subsidiary,first synthesized neonicotinoids in the 1980s a compound that not only withstood heat and sunlight, but could be applied to the root or seed of a plant and remain effective for that plants entire lifespan.

Neonics were hailed as the Goldilocks compound because they are not too hard, not too soft, but just right.

The new chemical came just in time. Farmers and regulators were seeking alternatives to another class of pesticides organophosphates, nerve agents sprayed on crops that had been found to cause cancer in humans. Initial studies of neonics showed that the compound was acutely toxic to insects but unlikely to cause harm to mammals.

As one scientist for Bayer described the invention in a 1993 Science magazine article hailing the introduction of the new class of chemicals, neonics were the Goldilocks compound because they are not too hard, not too soft, but just right.

And because seeds could be pretreated with neonics, which were absorbed and expressed through the tissue, nectar, and pollen, they could be also produced on an industrial scale, providing agriculture crops with an efficient insect-killing capability without the need for expensive spray treatments or constant reapplication.

In other words, farmers could soak the ground and seeds with enormous amounts of the compound to avoid problems from pests in the future. The delivery mechanism saved money for farmers but set the conditions for chronic overuse of the pesticides.

Estimated agricultural use of imidacloprid. Information compiled from the U.S. Geological Surveys Pesticide National Synthesis Project.

Map: USGS National Water-Quality Assessment, The Intercept

The first commercial neonic, imidacloprid, was registered with the EPA in 1994 and sold as a potato seed treatment. Business boomed as neonic products spread worldwide to Japan, France, Germany, and South Africa. In the U.S., it became a popular standard seed and root treatment for corn, cotton, soybeans, almonds, and a range of fruits and vegetables.

Neonics were even used for household applications. Bayer produced imidacloprid as a flea treatment on pets throughout the U.S. The Advantage line of flea control took off, with a marketing campaign featuring the Jack Russell terrier Eddie from the television show Frasier and a 30-foot inflatable flea in Times Square.

Chemical Week called the introduction of neonics a renaissance for the U.S. insecticides industry providing environmentally friendly products. The Columbus Dispatch, in an article for home gardeners about ways to deliver a surgical strike against pests, called for consumers to consider Bayers Merit soil treatment, which the paper called virtually non-toxic.

The swift adoption of the compound instantly made Bayer, which had previously profited largely from its pharmaceutical line of products, a worldwide player in the agrochemical industry.

Imidacloprid is our most important product,the head of Bayers pesticide division told investors in 2008.

In 2003, at a forum hosted by Goldman Sachs, Bayer listed Confidor, Premise, and Gaucho, several seed treatments based on neonic compounds, among its top-performing products in a presentation outlining the companys performance metrics. Another investor presentation, given by Bayer executives in Lyon, France, projected rapid growth from the neonic products, estimating that the firm, which had sales of close to 400 million euros from the portfolio in 1998, would more than double to 850 million euros by 2010.

Imidacloprid is our most important product, Friedrich Berschauer, then-head of Bayers pesticide division, told investors during a conference call in 2008, according to a transcript of his remarks. Company disclosures underscore Berschauers remarks: During that fiscal year, the company reported 932 million euros in sales for its top two neonic compounds.

Go here to see the original:
The Pesticide Industry's Playbook for Poisoning the Earth - The Intercept

CAPITAL REGION, N.Y. (NEWS10) Its becoming more common for people to have home security cameras to keep watch of their property, and law enforcement agencies are using it to their advantage.

Theyre a witness that never sleeps, NYS Trooper Kerra Burns says of home security cameras, theyre almost always on, most of them are motion activated.

Trooper Burns says home security cameras, like systems from Ring, Nest, or Swann, often urge the perps to turn back around before they commit an offense.

[If a] bad guy walks up your driveway, notices theyre on camera, maybe you have a motion light that goes off, Trooper Burns says, and they actually will turn around and walk away, so they are a great deterrent.

If they choose to go through with their suspicious behavior, Trooper Burns says the home surveillance video can be key to an investigation, even from the house next door.

There are times where weve had neighbors who have maybe had their car broken into, Trooper Burns says, and when we go in and do neighborhood interviews later, its actually their neighbors camera that picks up some of the people coming onto their land.

All you really need is the camera itself, and a smartphone or computer to watch a live feed of whats going on right outside your door. In many cases, you can install the system yourself.

See the original post:
Police using increase in home security cameras to their advantage - NEWS10 ABC

A security camera by itself works great as a crime deterrent. The majority of criminals target low-hanging fruit, and any hint of a security system will tell them that your home would be more trouble than its worth to break into. But what if the camera went beyond that and could recognize if an intruder had a weapon, or determine if a visitor was someone you knew? The Wazo Home Security System is powered by artificial intelligence and is capable of recognizing dangerous objects like guns or knives, and can then alert both you and the authorities within seconds.

The Wazo Home Security system uses these capabilities to do more than just home security, too. It can also recognize when someone falls and then alert both you and emergency services. Wazo built this functionality into the system to respond to the number of dangerous falls that happen each year; according to the company, more than 600,000 people are seriously injured by falls each year. By detecting these falls and alerting relevant authorities as soon as they happen, Wazo hopes to avoid some of the most severe injuries.

Finally, the system also boasts facial recognition. The A.I. learns the face of its main user, as well as the faces of friends and family. This adds a level of personalization to the alerts by letting users know when someone is at the door, but it also makes the system more secure because it alerts users if someone unfamiliar has arrived.

Wazo says there will be no monthly cost associated with monitoring and that the company has the lowest three-year cost of any home security system. A release date for the Wazo Home Security System has not yet been given, but the companys demonstration at CES 2020 drew a lot of attention. If youre interested in staying on top of the development cycle for the system, you can sign up for updates on the companys website.

While there may be a lot of security systems on the market, features like weapon and fall detection set Wazo apart from a lot of the competition. The facial recognition is another strong feature that gives the system a lot of potential to go beyond just home security and become an integral part of a connected home.

Read more:
The Wazo Home Security System can recognize knives and guns - Digital Trends

Persistence Market Research (PMR) has recently published a report with the title, DIY Home Security Solutions Market: Global Industry Analysis 2012-2016 and Forecast 2017-2025. An alarming rise in the number of crimes and burglary has triggered fear among people, thus leading to a rise in the adoption of security services and equipment. Due to the advancements in technology and the availability of internet connected devices, new smart home devices such as DIY home security systems are flourishing, which compliments the demand for an easy to install security system corresponding to the increasing crimes and burglaries globally. The demand for DIY home security systems is expected to witness significant growth during the forecast period. As a result, the global DIY home security solutions market is expected to foresee an outstanding CAGR of 22.4% over the course of the assessment period.

Consumer Tilt Towards Smart Homes to Bode Well for the Market

The adoption of smart homes and related applications in the past five years has increased significantly, especially in countries in Europe and North America, owing to the increasing advancements in home automation. The growing adoption of smart homes is expected to drive the demand for residential security gadgets. Smart home appliances include advanced security systems such as DIY home security systems, security alarms, video intercoms, sensors, electronic locks, and cameras.

Some of the other smart features include extensive control over the home living environment such as self-powered lighting, climate controls, fire alarms, and power management. Owing to the aforementioned factors, people are adopting security systems with advanced security features embedded in their smart home applications and are also considering this as a value added service for a better quality of living. These factors are encouraging DIY home security system vendors to innovate and come up with new solutions, which is further expected to propel the growth of the market in the long run.

A sample of this report is available upon request @https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/21109

Moreover, enhancements in internet penetration, network connection and the growing demand for wireless networks has propelled the use of home security solutions across the globe. The integration of a wireless network system has also eliminated the need for a skilled labor force, thus helping the owner in cutting unnecessary costs. However, if technology can be helpful and high-end, it can also cause errors and issues leading to the failure of the entire system such as network issues and false alarms. Further, the high reliability of professional security systems is another roadblock in the growth of the market.

Monitoring and Alarming Systems to be Most Preferred Product

In 2017, monitoring and alarming systems held a share of 68.5% in the global DIY security solutions market. It was closely trailed by DIY security cameras. It has been projected that the former will maintain its lead throughout the course of the forecast period owing to the fact that residential complexes prefer using monitoring and alarming systems over cameras as they find it difficult to keep track of camera monitoring. DIY security cameras are mostly used in commercial platforms such as shops and organizations.

Request for Methodology at:https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/methodology/21109

Innovation to Stay Focal Point of Leading Vendors in the Global Market

In order to stay competent in the market and surpass rivals, several top companies are focusing on new product launches with advanced features. Key players are also entering into mergers or partnerships in order to make use of the technology of other players and maintain a high rank in the market. Some of the leading companies operating in the global DIY home security solutions market are:

Go here to see the original:
Diy Home Security Solutions Market to Raise at a CAGR of 22.4% over the Forecast Period 2025 Dagoretti News - Dagoretti News

This case is not like other earbud-charging cases. Flip it over and it becomes a Qi charging pad for your phone!

Whew! We made it to Friday, everyone. And just a heads-up: I'm off Monday, though newsletter subscribers will receive their deal email as usual. (You do subscribe to the Cheapskate newsletter, right? If not, there's a sign-up box right at the bottom of this post!)

Today I couldn't decide on just one or two deals to share, so I'm giving you five!

Update: The Qi charging pad appears to be expired, but the other deals are still in effect!

Many modern true-wireless earbuds come inside a charging case that can recharge wirelessly, just by laying it on a Qi charging pad. The HolyHigh EA2 true-wireless earbuds come inside a case that is, itself, a Qi charging pad! It's true: Flip it over and lay your phone on it for easy on-the-go wireless charging.

So, in a way, it feels like you're buying a portable Qi power bank that just happens to have earbuds inside. And that power bank recharges via USB-C and has a Type-A USB output as well. If you use it just to keep the earbuds powered, the 5,000-mAh battery can net you a whopping 240 hours of total playtime, according to HolyHigh.

The earbuds themselves: Pipe design, noise-isolating eartips, IPX5-rated sweatproof and waterproof. I'm listening to them right now; the sound quality is decent given the price, maybe a little flat overall, lacking in detail but definitely good enough for the gym. As with all such earbuds, getting a good inner-ear seal is key.

Oh, and speaking of price: Just $33.49 when you clip the on-page $5-off coupon and then apply promo codeTYDZD2RDat checkout. That's less than what you'd pay for countless earbuds that don't have a super-versatile charging case.

In recent years, SimpliSafe has become synonymous with DIY home security. It's also known for offering one of the most affordable monitored security systems you can get.

For a limited time, it's even more affordable: This five-piece kit, originally $250, has never been priced this low. It includes the base station (with siren), a keypad, a motion sensor, an entryway sensor and a key fob. You also get a yard sign and window stickers, and you can expand the system with more sensors, a panic button, cameras and so on.

Monitoring is optional. Prices for that start at 50 cents per day.

Will Apple do away with the Lightning port someday? Perhaps -- but not yet. Until then, you might want to stock up on cables. This four-pack includes two 3-footers and two 6-footers -- the former good for car use, I think, where you don't want excessive cord cluttering up the place.

These cables are not only MFi-certified, they're also braided and covered by a lifetime warranty. What's not to like?

To get this price, apply promo code XQVDLEJW at checkout.

I'm increasingly enamored with LED light strips, whether as bias lighting for behind your TV or just to enhance your decor. Govee's 16.4-footer is ridiculously affordable, dropping to $14.53 when you clip the on-page 5%-off coupon.

The strip is controlled entirely by remote. (Some support Wi-Fi, just FYI, which allows for app and voice controls, but not this one.) With it you can adjust brightness and color, set custom scenes and so on. Definitely worth a look if you've yet to try this kind of "mood" lighting.

Here's the problem with many Qi charging pads: They don't come with wall plugs. Sure, you can use an extra one you've got lying around, but unless it's a QuickCharge (QC) plug, you won't get fast charging from the pad.

That's one reason I'm seriously liking this Seenda pad: It has an AC plug built in. What's more, it has a pair of Type-A USB ports right alongside, so you can use it to charge other devices while you're charging your phone. Handy!

The pad normally sells for $20, which is decent, but the price drops to $14 with promo code 30SEENDA57. Update: This code works only with seller ZYH Shop.

Have a great weekend, cheeps, and I'll see you back here on Tuesday!

This article was published previously. It has been updated to reflect current deals.

CNET's Cheapskate scours the web for great deals on tech products and much more. For the latest deals and updates, follow the Cheapskateon FacebookandTwitter. Find more great buys on theCNET Deals pageand check out ourCNET Coupons pagefor the latest promo codes fromBest Buy,Walmart,Amazon, andmore. Questions about the Cheapskate blog? Find the answers on our FAQ page.

Read the rest here:
Some deals to get you through the weekend: Headphones, home security, LED lighting and more - CNET

The issue of smart home security has once again been pushed into the spotlight with the latest incident:a hacker accessing the Ring security camerain a young girl's room.

According to CNN journalistsElizabeth Wolfe and Brian Ries, thehacker proceeded to harass the child, telling her he was "Santa Claus" and encouraging her to destroy her room.

Ring responded to the incident, claiming thatthe hacker accessed the camera, not through a data breach or a Ring security flaw, but through the victimized family's weak account security.

While consumers should certainly employ security bestpractices, like choosing unique passwords and setting up two-step authentification, incidents like this one and dozenslike it represent a growing trend of smart home vulnerabilities.

Although security has often been discussed as a software problem or a consumer problem, some developers have taken extra precautions to bake security into IoT components at the silicon level.

Here are a few semiconductor companies that have recently released components with hardware security in mind.

One example of a company taking hardware security to heart isMediaTek. The semiconductor company recently announced a new IoT chipset,Rich IoT,which is designed to tackleIoT challenges related to voice recognition, display, and vision.

Rich IoT includes i300A (MT8362A) for display-oriented devices, i300B (MT8362B)for voice-enabled devices, andi500(MT8385) for AI vision devices.

MediaTek claims that hardware security was a priority since the inception of this chipset, reflected in the company's choice to build inArms TrustZone security technology.

Arm posits that TrustZone technology establishes"a device root of trust based on Platform Security Architecture (PSA) guidelines" and offers ongoing support with operating system updates and security patches.

Arm TrustZone is said to onlyexecute code that is authorized and authenticated to ensure that malicious code has not been injected into a firmware update (this is what secure boot is particularly good at).

In addition to firmware security,the Rich IoT chipset comes with a software package called the Board Support Package (BSP), which allows over-the-air security updatesfor the Linux kernel, OpenSSL, and Yocto.

This solution addresses a pressingproblem ofIoT devicesthat they often go un-updated, despitebugs that can behard to fix on the fly.

Though security is paramount at the hardware level, asoftware-update toolis also essential to ensure that IoT devices are protected from new issues, making them less vulnerable to attackers.

Recognizing the trend in hardware security,IoTeX has announced two new IoT products, Ucam and Pebble Tracker.

The company prides itself as a leading privacy-IoT platform, incorporating multiple authorizationtechnologies. Theseincludeblockchain, confidential computing, and decentralized identity.

Thisrange of productsincorporates Intel and Arm'sTrusted Execution Environment in addition toblockchain technology. This combination is said to ensurethat code executed is 1) secure from attackers and 2)authenticated.

IoTeX also factored indata management in the new chipset.

Many other companies sell user data for profit without the user'sconsent, or the company obtains"consent" using dense, difficult-to-read contracts. (Haven't we all, at some point, clicked I Agree without reading the 5,000-word terms and conditions?)

But IoTeX claims that with their product lines, users are thesole owners of their data withtheopportunity to sell or trade data to third-party services, reveal data to service providers, or keep it entirely privateeven from IoTeX or IoT manufacturers.

Silicon Labs' ERF32BG22 is anotherexample of how IoT SoCs are shifting towardhardware security. The (PDF) SoC incorporates all the typical features you would expect from an IoT SoC including Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, an ArmCortex processor, clock management, and peripherals; but multiple security features are also included.

LikeMediaTek's Rich IoT platform and IoTeX's product line, Silicon Labs' new SoC includes Arm'sTrustZone to create a secure hardware environment for the main application code to run.

It also incorporates secure-boot,Root-of-Trust Secure Loader (RTSL), which can ensure the authenticity of firmware updates as well as the booting sequence. Thisensures that malicious code cannot be injected into the boot sequence.

The SoC also includes hardware cryptography, a true random number generator, and a secure debug to allow designers to safely debug devices while not leaving them potentially exposed to attackers.

When IoT devices were first introduced, many designers did not incorporate strong security features (if at all).

Now that usersare becoming aware of troubling security problems, as in the Ring security camera incident, many designers must consider at least some measure ofhardware securityto prevent attackers from accessing data.

Many designs are utilizing secure boot systems whereby only authenticated boot code can be accessed and some designs even include multistage boot load sequences. Updating devices over-the-air can be highly beneficial as it can patch potential security risks, but this may be exploitable with a rogue update.

For many years,hardware engineers only incorporated simple security features such as IP protection. But now that attackers are increasingly hacking hardware, we should continue to develop ways toprevent our smart home devices from becoming gateways to places we never intended.

Read more here:
Three Recent IoT Platforms That Show Smart Home Security Isn't Just a Software Problem - News - All About Circuits