From left: 66 Hudson Boulevard, 200 Amsterdam Avenue and One Vanderbilt (Credit: Tishman Speyer; 200 Amsterdam; KPF)

A controversial Upper West Side condo tower is one of nearly 900 projects that have secured exemptions from Gov. Andrew Cuomos order shutting down most types of construction throughout the state, according to a map released Friday by the citys Department of Buildings.

Certain work on SJP Properties and Mitsui Fudosan Americas 200 Amsterdam Avenue which faces potential deconstruction after a judge ruled the 668-foot tower was about 20 stories too high is allowed to continue after the city granted the project essential status.

SJPs tower is one of 402 projects to receive essential status to do emergency work. The majority of site safety work for 200 Amsterdam will be completed today, a spokesperson for the developers said. According to the Department of Buildings, workers at the site are pumping water out of elevator pits to prevent electrical damage.

Other notable projects that can remain active for that reason include SL Greens Midtown East office tower One Vanderbilt and Tishman Speyers twisting office tower at 66 Hudson Boulevard, known as the Spiral.

A representative for SL Green indicated that it received approval to continue work on transit-related spaces and base building life-safety systems at One Vanderbilt. A statement from Tishman Speyer said, Construction work on The Spiral has stopped. We are in the final stages of securing the site and completing all of the tasks mandated by the DOB for stalled projects.

Cuomos construction shutdown to curb the coronavirus pandemic was simply the latest hurdle for the developers of 200 Amsterdam. SJP and Mitsui are still waiting on the courts to decide the 52-story buildings fate after a judge ruled in February that the city erred in letting them build so high. The developers and the de Blasio administration are appealing the decision.

When the state shut down non-essential construction late last month it exempted work for utilities, transit, healthcare and homeless shelters, as well as emergency work and affordable housing. Earlier this week, the Department of Buildings defined emergency work as restoration of utilities services or work that would pose a public danger if left undone.

The city considers residential projects affordable if at least 30 percent of the units are income-restricted or have a mandatory or voluntary inclusionary housing agreement.

According to the buildings agency, construction is continuing on 157 affordable housing projects, including Related Companies 15 Hudson Yards, a 300-unit condo and rental tower building, of which 107 units will be set aside for tenants making between 50 percent and 60 percent of the area median income. Its unclear what work is being done at the project, which opened last year, but the agency approved an application for renovation work to install a new dropped ceiling on a condo unit in the tower Wednesday. There are another 170 affordable projects that are labeled as emergency work on DOBs map as of Friday, where work will be permitted to continue.

Buildings data indicates construction on three homeless shelters is ongoing. Of the essential sites, 262 involve healthcare facilities and 63 utilities.

An unprecedented crisis requires an unprecedented response, Commissioner Melanie La Rocca said in a statement. To help keep New Yorkers safe during these uncertain times, we will be out in force to confirm non-essential sites have been closed down, and essential construction work continues in a safe manner.

Sites that dont comply with the new rules face fines of up to $10,000. The agency has also rescinded permits for after-hours work and will only approve those that are for essential or emergency work.

The state initially exempted all construction but added restrictions after backlash from local officials, workers and workers families. Since the governors order, individual construction workers have contacted The Real Deal to express fear about contracting Covid-19, citing the difficulty in keeping a safe distance from others while working on crowded construction sites.

Some sites have temporarily shut down voluntarily after employees tested positive for the virus.

Sylvia Varnham ORegan contributed reporting.

Write to Kathryn Brenzel at [emailprotected]

See the original post:
Some luxury condos, office towers escape construction ban - The Real Deal

When Gov. Jay Inslee announced Thursday that he would extend Washingtons stay-at-home order to May 4, he added a comment that will likely serve as the final word on one of the orders most hotly debated aspects: A ban on residential construction.

We made that decision, Inslee said. It stands.

Inslees answer comes as a blow to Clark Countys construction industry, which has joined the statewide industry in calling for residential construction to be designated essential due to the urgent need for affordable housing.

Residential construction contributes $23 million per day to the economy, making the classification of our industrys activities as non-essential even more devastating to our already struggling economy, wrote Avaly Scarpelli, executive director of the Building Industry Association of Clark County, in response to Inslees comment.

When Washingtons stay-at-home order was first announced, it included a number of construction and trade worker specializations on its list of essential workers, which industry groups took as a signal that construction was exempted from the shutdown.

Many job sites kept operating until March 25, when Inslee issued a memo clarifying that certain types of construction projects are essential such as government-related projects or emergency repairs but that all other construction projects, both residential and commercial, must shut down.

During the following week, construction business owners and industry leaders argued that housing is an essential service, citing federal guidance from the Department of Homeland Security that included residential construction on a recommended list of essential services.

The industry also argued that Washingtons construction policy makes it an outlier; most states that have instituted stay-at-home orders have exempted residential construction, including Oregon but so far, Oregons new coronavirus numbers have been relatively encouraging.

Their trends are lower than ours. Everything seems to be lower, said Tracy Doriot, vice president of the Building Industry Association of Washington. Our (construction industry) should be able to operate in a similar fashion with a similar result.

Washington isnt completely alone in its approach. New York, Pennsylvania and Michigan have applied a similar standard, along with smaller jurisdictions within other states such as Boston and the Bay Area counties in California. And while construction work has been allowed to continue in Oregon, the industry hasnt been immune to concerns about the spread of the virus at worksites. According to multiple reports from Portland-area media, Oregons Occupational Health and Safety agency received more than 1,200 coronavirus-related workplace complaints in March, some of which came from the construction industry.

The other big refrain from homebuilders is that the large, outdoor nature of construction sites should allow workers to implement adequate social distancing measures. Some things would need to change, said Patrick Ginn, owner of Vancouver-based homebuilding company Ginn Group plumbing and electrical workers often operate next to each other, for example but the changes wouldnt be any bigger than what other industries have had to do.

It seems like if I can order a Jimmy Johns sandwich, a guy can be working on framing in the open air, Ginn said.

At the Thursday press conference, Inslee said the construction issue was a difficult decision, but he credited it and other tough measures for Washingtons relative success at containing the coronavirus outbreak.

Its working, he said. The things were doing are showing success, and thats what ought to give us confidence that we should continue on this road of not giving up.

Despite Inslees comments, Scarpelli said the Clark County BIA and its state counterpart will continue to advocate for an essential exemption. The Clark County Council added its voice to the mix at its meeting Tuesday by voting 4-1 to sign a letter calling on Inslee to lift the moratorium on residential construction.

This issue with construction, and home construction in particular, is critical not just for our county but our state, Councilor Julie Olson said.

The impact to local builders has been severe; Doriot, who also owns Clark County-based Doriot Construction, said all of his projects have had to come to a complete halt.

The state order does still allow for emergency home construction, but Doriot said many local jurisdictions have passed their own restrictions and its been a challenge to make sure that an emergency project doesnt run afoul of local rules even if it appears to comply with state guidelines.

Ginn Group is the umbrella company that handles both homebuilding and real estate sales through various subsidiaries, and Ginn said the order puts the company in a bind because it does allow real estate sales to continue, subject to social-distancing restrictions.

We have 90 houses under construction that have pending sales on them, he said. Some of (the buyers) have sold their houses and made moving plans.

Many of those buyers face a deadline to move out of their prior houses, Ginn said, and they cant wait around indefinitely for the order to be lifted so their new house can be finished.

As a company, Ginn Group is well-positioned to ride out the shutdown because it also deals in property management, Ginn said, and it has some contracts for work on projects with the city of Vancouver, which would be exempted under the order.

Still, the loss of residential construction is damaging, and the company has been left seeking more guidance about how to handle pending sales, he said.

Washingtons rate of new cases has been slowing down in recent days, and Doriot said he and others in the industry are hoping that success may prompt Inslees office to allow construction to resume before the May 4 cutoff or at the very least, to not extend the shutdown any further.

The industry has succeeded in winning one item: A delay in the implementation of new state building codes to Nov. 1. The updated codes had previously been slated to take effect July 1, and the Building Industry Association of Washington had lobbied Inslee to delay the change in order to allow for adequate training time after the stay-at-home order ends.

See the rest here:
Clark County construction industry urges Inslee to rethink its status - The Columbian

BYNAN K. CHASE

Tick, tick, tick.

The clock is counting down toward the city of Ashevilles self-imposed deadline, adopted in 2018, to have all city operations including municipal buildings powered by renewable energy by the end of 2030. And the citys recent declaration of a climate emergency adds further urgency to the situation. Can we agree that Asheville needs a new City Building before then?

Im the first to admit that my heart skips a beat every time I catch sight of Douglas Ellingtons bold creation (aka City Hall). Its beautiful, unique and it represents the citys Roaring 20s economy (1920s, that is).

But while the iconic building is an instantly recognizable symbol of Asheville, a look at the facts reveals it as a dinosaur when it comes to technology and use of space. Its heating system, modernized last year at a cost of nearly $800,000, runs on natural gas, which doesnt count as renewable. We have not assessed the cost of conversion to electric, says Walter Ear, the citys capital projects building construction program manager.

When the historic structure was dedicated in 1928, its terra cotta tiles were touted as providing a watertight, practical and enduring roof. But time took its toll: In 2015, the city spent $3.8 million to replace portions of the vintage roofing and drainage systems that were beyond repair, according to a certificate of appropriateness for rehabilitation; the lengthy process included tuck-pointing all masonry joints.

Is it any wonder that form failed to follow function? Ellington designed the building in 24 hours or less, according to a nomination form for its inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places in 1976, and only minor changes were made before construction began. The floor plan, the nomination states, was typical of many office buildings of the 1920s. Rectangular offices occur at the perimeter of each floor. Most of the remaining central space is filled by a large service core which contains public elevators and an enclosed maintenance stairway.

The original three elevators, which have open gratings and require city-paid operators, are scheduled to be replaced over the next two years, according to Ear. The cost is unknown, since the design work isnt due to be finalized till this fall. And the buildings magnificent front doors have been rejiggered with a glassed-in antechamber whose wind tunnel aerodynamics merit a warning sign.

According to Ear, the building contains over 95,500 square feet of space. But only about 60,000 square feet of that is actual office or meeting space (plus the room allocated for security screening). What was described as a monumental Council chamber in 1928 is inadequate now; large public hearings are often held elsewhere or spill over into other rooms.

Meanwhile, is it even worth talking about retrofitting this fossil with up-to-date communications technology and renewable energy infrastructure? According to the recently posted 126-page final report laying out pathways for Ashevilles transition to 100 percent renewable energy, the city wont be able to reach its goal in time without purchasing renewable energy credits as substitutes for direct renewable power generation, but public input rated that option the lowest of various choices. Relying solely on solar panels for municipal buildings wont work: Asheville would need 960 rooftop solar systems or 73 acres of land for power generation, and according to Ear, the City Building is a poor candidate for rooftop solar.

So whats the city to do? What other cities and counties do all the time: build new facilities and either repurpose existing structures, sell them or tear them down.

Ashevilles previous city hall lasted all of 34 years before being razed. Kannapolis, N.C., population 50,000, built a 106,000-square-foot city hall in 2015 for $28 million; Concord, population 92,000, opened a new $17 million city hall in 2016.

Booming, high-tech Raleigh has become a leader in energy efficiency, requiring new municipal buildings over 10,000 square feet to meet at least LEED Silver standards and to maximize sustainability concerns when renovating existing structures. The city has also taken steps to incorporate geothermal and solar power, occupancy sensors and LED lighting into municipal buildings.

Farther afield, Greensburg, Kan., a dying farm town that was blown off the map by a tornado in 2007, has a new lease on life. The entire town is being rebuilt as a model green city powered by wind, solar and sensible daylighting design. The new town hall is breathtaking. Columbus, Ind., internationally known for its architectural excellence, built a stunning new city hall back in 1981; the original 1895 civic building, listed on the National Register in 1979, was renovated in 1986 and later converted into a mix of loft apartments and offices.

Asheville could do something similar, using cutting-edge materials such as superinsulation and solar-generating glass sheathing, concrete and brick. By all means keep Ellingtons tower intact, but either sell it or lease it. As long as its not part of municipal operations, the city can declare victory and move on.

Symbolism matters, too. The City Building went up at the end of Ashevilles horse-and-buggy era: Antibiotics hadnt been invented yet, women had only recently won the vote, and Jim Crow reigned. At the buildings dedication ceremony, the musical selections included Dixie, and Confederate President Jefferson Davis got a shoutout. Does that really represent todays Asheville?

Ellington himself praised the broad outlook of the officials who had the project in charge for allowing him to entertain a fresh point of view. And 92 years later, Asheville should once again look to the future with a fresh point of view, instead of remaining anchored to its past. After all, innovation is renewable energy.

Nan K. Chase is the author of Lost Restaurants of Asheville and Asheville: A History. She previously served on the Historic Resources Commission of Asheville and Buncombe County.

See the rest here:
It's time to replace Asheville's City Hall - Mountain Xpress

A powerful combination of natural resources and local initiative is pushing one southern state to the forefront of architectural innovation in the country. In Arkansas, a place thats far from the professions traditional epicenters in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles, big things are happening.

In Bentonville, Wheeler Kearns Architects just repurposed a defunct Kraft cheese factory into The Momentary, the contemporary offshoot of the Moshe Safdiedesigned Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art. Over two hundred miles south in Little Rock, Studio Gang and SCAPE Landscape Architecture are working together to renovate and extend the Arkansas Arts Center, a 104-year-old cultural institution attached to MacArthur Park. Construction on the 127,000-square-foot project broke ground last fall. At the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville, a massive research complex, the Anthony Timberlands Center for Design and Materials Innovation is slated to come online in 2022 courtesy of Grafton Architects, and last year the school finished the countrys largest mass timber building, Adohi Hall, a 202,027-square-foot dormitory designed by a team led by Leers Weinzapfel Associates.

Grafton Architects proposal for the Anthony Timberlands Center for Design and Materials Innovation demonstrates the design and structural potential of timber. (Courtesy University of Arkansas/Grafton Architects)

Topographically, Arkansas varies widely from its forested and rocky northwest corner to the eastern wetlands that follow the Mississippi River. Fifty-six percent of the state is covered in forestland. From the mountainous Ozarks region in the northwest to the deep-soil Delta in the southeast, the states diverse wood basket supplies yield high-quality forest products, along with 27,000 jobs in paper production and wood-related manufacturing. According to the Arkansas Economic Development Commission, some of the states largest employers include Georgia-Pacific, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Weyerhaeuser, and WestRock Corporation, each owning at least two manufacturing facilities or more within the borders of Arkansas.

The timber industry is one of the states biggest economic drivers. The Walton family, a.k.a. the founders of Walmart, Inc., is another. The Walton Family Foundation has made it its mission to develop high-design public buildings and community gathering spaces for the states Benton and Washington counties, home of Fayetteville, Springdale, and Bentonville. Since Walmart made the latter its home base in 1971, its required all collaborators and retailers to set up shop in the area as well, thereby forcefully growing the population of the city year after year.

Adohi Hall is a two-million-square-foot structure constructed primarily of CLT at the University of Arkansas. (Timothy Hursley)

The ripple effects of Walmarts investment are already being felt around the state. While Adohi Hall might hold the title of Americas biggest mass timber building now, Genslers design for Walmarts new timber-structured Home Office in nearby Bentonville will surpass it with 2.5 million square feet of mid-rise office space and amenity buildings. Canadian manufacturer Structurlam announced in December that it had bought an existing building in Conway, Arkansas, for $90 million and will retrofit it into a mass timber facility so that it can, in part, supply Walmart with the 1.1 million cubic feet of timber products needed for the project.

Hardy Wentzel, CEO of Structurlam, said that latching onto a large-scale construction project at the start of a new site investment is a dream come true. It really helped solidify our desire to move to Arkansas in our first U.S. expansion. I wanted to anchor my investment with a large contract and Walmart was the perfect opportunity.

An aerial rendering of the new 300-acre Walmart campus. (Courtesy Walmart Inc.)

Structurlam isnt the only timber manufacturer expanding into the state. Texas CLT recently reopened a defunct laminating mill in the southwest city of Magnolia where it produces CLT products from southern pine and Douglas fir.

Walmart, however, doesnt compete with hardly anyoneespecially in Arkansas. For the last six years since 2015, the Foundation has utilized its burgeoning Northwest Arkansas Design Excellence Program to get major firms working to reshape the region such as Ross Barney Architects and de Leon & Primmer Architecture Workshop. Other firms slated to do future work include Architecture Research Office, Deborah Berke Partners, MASS Design Group, Trahan Architects, and Michael Van Valkenburgh Architects.

Last summer, LTL Architects completed an early childhood education center in Bentonville and Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects was chosen to create a 50-acre cultural arts corridor in Fayetteville. The latter project will thread through downtown near the citys recently-opened performing arts center, TheatreSquared, designed by Marvel Architects.

When asked about her first impression of Arkansas and the Design Excellence Programs work to fabricate these places with consistent new construction, Lissa So, founding partner of Marvel, said the initiative, which seeks to preserve a sense of place by encouraging quality design of public spaces, according its website, doesnt feel contrived. Arkansas feels like home to me, So told AN. I grew up in Upstate New York and I love the close-knit community and emphasis on connecting with nature.

So sees the 50,0000-square-foot TheatreSquaredwhich has attracted much buzz since opening in Augustas part of a cultural renaissance in Northwest Arkansas. The project embodies Fayettevilles desire to develop its arts-related offerings and get more people interested in downtown. In 2006, it adopted a citywide master plan with zoning updates and street enhancements that enabled these goals.

The Studio Gang-designed Arkansas Arts Center in Little Rock. (Courtesy Studio Gang)

Arkansas thinks of itself as the epicenter of arts between Chicago and Miami and if you look around, it feels that way, said Jonathan Marvel, principal of Marvel Architects. When it comes to building the city of Fayetteville itself, theres a significant amount of attention and pride devoted to craftsmanship and ownership here.

The local design community is also rife with regional pride and uses the states abundant resources like timber and stone to build structures that speak to local designers mission-driven ambition, according to Chris Baribeau. Baribeau is the design principal and cofounder of modus studioone of the teams behind the $79 million Adohi Hall and the universitys new corrugated aluminum Sculpture Studio. Much of the firms work involves designing K-12 schools for Arkansas rural communities, which fulfills its bent toward helping underserved populations.

Theres a real opportunity here to do something thats meaningful, he said. We can prove that our approach to design and construction is actually for the betterment of people, not just about making beautiful objects or celebrating ourselves. Theres certainly a strong contingent of architects in Arkansas that believe in that ethos and work hard to make a difference here.

To many young architects like Baribeau, Marlon Blackwell is at the heart of this approach to design. Blackwell has worked in Arkansas since 1992 and is the most recent recipient of the American Institute of Architects highest honor, the 2020 AIA Gold Medal. If anyone has observed and influenced the changes that Arkansas has experienced in the last 30 years, its him. His eponymous firms seminal projects, such as the Keenan TowerHouse, completed in 2000, and the St. Nicholas Eastern Orthodox Church, finished just over a decade later, shaped what became a new vernacular in Arkansas, one thats continually broken down preconceived notions of what buildings look like in the American South.

The Fay Jones School of Architecture and Design. (Timothy Hursley)

To bridge the gap of recognition that the state deserves, Blackwell, like other area firms, promotes projects from other practices and preaches about the culture of working in the region. Many of us are standing on the shoulders of great native architects like E. Fay Jones and Warren Dennis Segraves, he said, but the difference between our work and theirs is that we are now taking on the public realm. There are many younger firms out there willing to fight the good fight and push progressive thinking on major civic projects. Its a continual battle, but much of our recent success has also come from an enlightened clientele.

Whether its the university or the Walton family providing opportunity in Northwest Arkansas or arts organizations, the public school system, or business development districts looking to invest in the states southern half, projects are aplenty. As part of the architectural profession, Blackwell said, its his responsibility to demonstrate that every one of those opportunities deserves good design.

Our mission is to provide alternative models that change the benchmark of reality for folks here, he added. The more examples you can point to, the more reality is improved.

Take the Anthony Timberlands Center for Design and Materials Innovation, the focus of a design competition facilitated by the University of Arkansas. Timber is a dominant focus of study at the universitys Fay Jones School of Architecture and Design, where students get to work with a cast of high-profile professors like Blackwell, who shares his passion for sustainable materials, and Stephen Luoni, who directs the award-winning University of Arkansas Community Design Center. Since Peter MacKeith, dean of the Fay Jones School, came to Fayetteville from St. Louis in 2014, hes been working to deepen the schools timber research program. A major part of this is the Timberlands Center, which will expand the universitys ability to undertake research projects, MacKeith said. The school already operates out of its longtime home Vol Walker Hall and the Marlon Blackwell Architectsdesigned Steven L. Anderson Design Center.

Exterior rendering of Grafton Architects winning proposal for the Anthony Timberlands Center for Design and Materials Innovation. (Courtesy University of Arkansas/Grafton Architects)

So much of what were doing across the school is emphasizing the relationship of thinking to making and the ambitions of our students have become larger in scale, tools, and techniques, MacKeith said. Weve outgrown the capacities of what we can do in our existing building.

In mid-March, Grafton Architects, led by 2020 Pritzker Prize winners Yvonne Farrell and Shelley McNamara, won an international competition for the Timberlands Center, besting 68 other entries and five other shortlisted firms: WT/GO Architecture, Dorte Mandrup A/S, Shigeru Ban Architects, Kennedy & Violich Architecture, and Lever Architecture. The competition was partially funded by grants from the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities.

To MacKeith, the momentum that the university has built over the last five years is due in part, because Arkansas is a small state and the schools reach of influence extends all the way to the top.

We saw an opportunity where design education could be a benefit to the states greatest natural resource and my approach has been to make sure that the governor, the state legislature, as well as investors, and people at companies in Arkansas, understand that we can be part of the forest ecosystem, he said. Generally speaking, our students are quite concerned about the world they are going to be practicing in and living in and they want to be able to act responsibly. As a public land grant university, thats why we work so much with people outside the corners of our campus.

Interior rendering of Grafton Architects winning proposal for the Anthony Timberlands Center for Design and Materials Innovation. (Courtesy University of Arkansas/Grafton Architects)

Its this open-minded ambition that is pushing a distinctive architectural agenda in the state. Chris Baribeau added that theres an undertone of respect across Arkansas for the critical thinking and people-first attitude that local architects are bringing to projects, though he acknowledged that its taking some work to get that same respect on a national stage. Arkansas is speaking up.

Read more:
Innovation in Arkansas shouldn't be overlooked - The Architect's Newspaper

The rush of commercial real estate development has truly become a statewide phenomenon, and the 2020 Real Estate Development (RED) Awards reflect just how widespread the activity has been in Arizona.

AZRE magazine received a record number of nominations for the RED Awards this year, and 17 were for projects away from the Valley, making it a truly statewide event. And just like the number of nominations was something never before seen in the 15-year history of the RED Awards, this years RED Awards ceremony is a first, too. Because of the ongoing coronavirus crisis, this years RED Awards ceremony is being held virtually, which now makes this annual showcase of Arizonas best commercial real estate projects a global event.

This years projects were some of the most impactful developments the state has seen in this millennium. Now, the world can celebrate the incredible commercial real estate projects that were completed in 2019. Here are the 15th Annual RED Awards.

Here are the finalists for the 2020 RED Awards, by category:

Owner: Marana Unified School District

General Contractor: CHASSE Building Team

Project Manager: CHASSE Building Team

Architect: Corgan

Subcontractors: Comfort Systems, PM&M Drywall, J.B. Steel, Blanco Concrete, Sun Valley Masonry, Advanced Structural Engineering, Inc., Energy Systems Design, Inc.,

Owner: Northern Arizona University

General Contractor: CORE Construction

Architect: RSP Architects

Subcontractors: Meyer | Borgman |Johnson; McKay Conant Hoover, Inc.; Henderson Engineers; Peak Engineering; The Ruzika Company, Inc.

Owner: Western Maricopa Education Center

General Contractor: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.

Project Manager: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.

Architect: SPS+ Architects

Subcontractors: Urban Energy, Stonecold Masonry, Progressive Roofing, Rouser Concrete, Pete King

Owner: Banner Health

General Contractor: Sundt/DPR (Joint venture)

Project Manager: Sundt/DPR (Joint venture)

Architect: Shepley Bulfinch/GLHN

Subcontractors: Sundt Construction (concrete & civil), DPR Construction (interior framing & drywall), University Mechanical, Sturgeon/Stark, Sun Valley Masonry

Owner: RyanPlaza Ironwood, LLC

Developer: Ryan Companies US, Inc. and Plaza Companies (Joint venture)

General Contractor: Ryan Companies US, Inc.

Project Manager: Ryan Companies US, Inc.

Architect: Butler Design Group

Subcontractors: Schuff Steel, Commonwealth Electric Co. of the Midwest, McKinney Glass, Diversified Interiors

Owner: Summit Healthcare

Developer: NexCore Group

General Contractor: Haydon Building Corp.

Project Manager: NexCore Group

Architect: Orcutt Winslow

Subcontractors: Western Grade, DW Lusk, Castle Steel, TDI Industries, Carlson & Sons

Owner: Casino del Sol

General Contractor: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.

Project Manager: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.

Architect: Cuningham Group Architecture, PA

Subcontractors: Mirage Plastering, Inc.; Conway Tile Co., Inc.; Cutting Edge Fabrication LLC; Progressive Roofing; Millwork by Design, Inc.

Owner: Somera Capital Management, Jackson-Shaw, Plaza Companies, Arizona State University, Holualoa Companies

Developer: Jackson-Shaw

General Contractor: Layton Construction

Project Manager: Plaza Companies

Architect: Cooper Carry Inc.

Subcontractors: Hardrock Concrete Placement, Pete King Construction Company, Progressive Leasing, Diversified Interiors, Beecroft LLC.

Owner: Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.

General Contractor: Mortenson

Project Manager: Mortenson

Architect: Gensler

Subcontractors: Suntec, ISEC, PCI, MKB, Commercial Air/Pueblo Mechanical

Developer: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc.

General Contractor: Ryan Companies US, Inc.

Project Manager: Ryan Companies US, Inc.

Architect: Ford & Associates Architects, Inc.

Subcontractors: Granite Construction, Suntec Concrete Inc., Architectural Openings, Charles Court, HACI

Owner: Northrop Grumman

Developer: Douglas Allred Company

General Contractor: Willmeng Construction

Project Manager: Willmeng Construction

Architect: Balmer Architectural Group

Owner: Pasternack Properties

Developer: Irwin G. Pasternack, AIA, Architect and Associates pc

General Contractor: Graycor Construction Companies and Nitti Builders LLC

Project Manager: Graycor Construction Companies and Nitti Builders LLC

Architect: Irwin G. Pasternack, AIA, Architect pc

Subcontractors: Desert Structures, Deer Valley Plumbing, Specified Electrical Contractors, Miner Southwest, Olympic West Fire Protection, Ricor Inc., Ronning Landscaping, Scotts Diversified, Roofing Southwest, Suntec Concrete

Owner: The Opus Group

Developer: Opus Development Company

General Contractor: Opus Design Build

Project Manager: Opus Design Build

Architect: Opus Architecture & Engineering

Subcontractors: Hunt, Cannon & Wendt, Horowitz, Bel-Aire Mechanical, Suntec

Owner: CRP/Marwest Landing | Owner, LLC

Developer: CRP/Marwest Landing | Owner, LLC

General Contractor: D.L. Withers Construction

Project Manager: Ware Malcomb

Architect: Ware Malcomb

Subcontractors: Hunter Engineering, TLCP Structural, Inc., Kraemer Consulting Engineers, PLLC, Studio DPA, Speedie & Associates

Owner: Conor Commercial Real Estate

Developer: Conor Commercial Real Estate

General Contractor: McShane Construction Company

Project Manager: McShane Construction Company

Architect: DLR Group

Subcontractors: Suntec Concrete, The Structures Group SW, CJS Enterprises, Jenco Inc., Olympic West Fire Protection

Owner: RED Development

Developer: RED Development

General Contractor: Whiting-Turner Contracting Company

Project Manager: Suntec Concrete

Architect: Omniplan

Subcontractors: Suntec Concrete, Stonecold Masonry, Walters & Wolf, NKW, DDE, PK Associates Structural

Owner: Forum Real Estate Group

Developer: Forum Real Estate Group

General Contractor: JE Dunn Construction

Project Manager: JE Dunn Construction

Architect: Humphreys & Partners Architects

Subcontractors: Suntec Concrete, PK Associates Structural, E&K Companies, Diversified Interiors, Blount Contracting, HACI

Owner: Fenix Development, Inc.

Developer: Fenix Development, Inc.

General Contractor: Okland Construction

Excerpt from:
Watch the 15th Annual RED Awards here - AZ Big Media

DUBLIN, April 8, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Net Zero Energy Buildings Market Research Report: By Construction, Equipment - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends and Growth Forecast to 2024" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

In 2018, the global net zero energy buildings (NZEB) market generated a revenue of $896.6 million and is projected to attain a value of $2,106.6 million in 2024, advancing at a 15.6% CAGR during the forecast period (2019-2024).

The market is growing due to the plans of government regarding energy efficiency and rising requirement for NZEBs for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A building with zero net energy consumption, that is, the amount of energy utilized by the building is generated through renewable sources on the site, is referred to as NZEB.

In terms of construction, the net zero energy buildings market is bifurcated into commercial and residential. Between these two, the commercial category held the larger share, of 98.4%, of the market in 2018. This is because commercial construction requires more floor spaces, which results in increased construction value of the building. In addition to this, the governments around the world are introducing policies for encouraging construction of NZEBs for reducing power consumption through fossil fuels. The residential category is predicted to grow at a faster pace during the forecast period.

When equipment is taken into consideration, the net zero energy buildings market is categorized into heating, ventilation, & air conditioning systems, solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, lighting systems, insulation panels, and others (which include solar thermal systems and wind turbines). Among these, the solar PV panels dominated the market during the historical period (2014-2018), with a share of 57.1% in 2018. This was because commercial floor spaces need a considerable amount of energy to power all appliances in a building, which results in increased requirement for solar PV panels.

Among all the regions, namely Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, and Rest of the World, North America accounted for the largest share, of 79.1%, of the net zero energy buildings market in 2018, and is further predicted to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period. This is because of the rising concerns regarding greenhouse gas emissions, which, in turn, has led to a shift toward NZEB. In addition to this, the increasing number of government initiatives is also resulting in the growth of the market.

One of the key driving factors of the net zero energy buildings market is the requirement for NZEBs for reducing GHG emissions. The burning of fossil fuels for producing energy has resulted in an increased percentage of carbon dioxide and other harmful gases in the atmosphere. As per the World Green Building Council, construction and buildings account for over 35% of the global energy usage and approximately 40% of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. Thus, in order to prevent further rise in the percentage of these gases in the atmosphere, several countries are shifting toward NZEBs.

The energy efficiency plans by governments is another major driving factor of the net zero energy buildings market. Several governments around the world are taking various initiatives for using renewable energy at a larger scale and reducing the utilization of non-renewable energy in both commercial and residential areas. Such plans are helping governments in making use of other renewable energy sources for fulfilling the energy requirements. For instance, the California Public Utilities Commission implemented the California Long-Term Energy Efficiency Strategy Plan, with the aim of adopting best practices for energy efficiency.

Hence, the market is registering growth due to the increasing number of initiatives regarding energy efficiency by the government and rising need for NZEBs to reduce GHG emissions.

Key Topics Covered

Chapter 1. Research Background

1.1 Research Objectives

1.2 Market Definition

1.3 Research Scope

1.3.1 Market Segmentation by Construction

1.3.2 Market Segmentation by Equipment

1.3.3 Market Segmentation by Geography

1.3.4 Analysis Period

1.3.5 Market Data Reporting Unit

1.3.5.1 Value

1.4 Key Stakeholders

Chapter 2. Research Methodology

2.1 Secondary Research

2.2 Primary Research

2.2.1 Breakdown of Primary Research Respondents

2.2.1.1 By region

2.2.1.2 By industry participant

2.2.1.3 By company type

2.3 Market Size Estimation

2.4 Data Triangulation

2.5 Assumptions for the Study

Chapter 3. Executive Summary

Chapter 4. Introduction

4.1 Definition of Market Segments

4.1.1 By Construction

4.1.1.1 Residential

4.1.1.2 Commercial

4.1.2 By Equipment

4.1.2.1 Solar PV panels

4.1.2.2 Insulation panels

4.1.2.3 Lighting systems

4.1.2.4 HVAC systems

4.1.2.5 Others

4.2 Market Dynamics

4.2.1 Drivers

4.2.1.1 Demand for NZEBs to reduce GHG emissions

4.2.1.2 Energy efficiency plans by governments

4.2.1.3 Impact analysis of drivers on market forecast

4.2.2 Restraints

4.2.2.1 High development cost and complex designing of NZEBs

4.2.2.2 Impact analysis of restraints on market forecast

4.2.3 Opportunities

4.2.3.1 Development initiatives for NZEBs

Chapter 5. Key Performance Indicators

5.1 Construction of NZEBs

5.2 Cost Analysis

5.3 ZEBRA2020

Chapter 6. Regulatory Framework

6.1 U.S.

6.2 Canada

6.3 U.K.

6.4 China

6.5 Japan

6.6 South Korea

6.7 Australia

6.8 Associations

Chapter 7. Global Market Size and Forecast

Chapter 8. North America Market Size and Forecast

Chapter 9. Europe Market Size and Forecast

Chapter 10. APAC Market Size and Forecast

Chapter 11. Row Market Size and Forecast

Chapter 12. Competitive Landscape

12.1 Global Strategic Developments of Key Players

12.2 List of NZEBs in the U.S.

Chapter 13. Company Profiles

13.1 Kingspan Group plc

13.1.1 Business Overview

13.1.2 Product and Service Offerings

13.1.3 Key Financial Summary

13.2 NetZero Buildings

13.3 DPR Construction

13.4 Daikin Industries Ltd.

13.5 Rockwool Group

13.6 Xtratherm Limited

13.7 SunPower Corporations

13.8 Solatube International Inc.

For more information about this report visit

https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/3negpm

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Here is the original post:
Global $2.1 Bn Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) Markets, Forecast to 2024 - Construction of NZEBs, Cost Analysis, and ZEBRA2020 KPIs - PRNewswire

These people have to go to work and sweat all day with fear: A Q&A with Christopher Morgan, the construction worker petitioning the province to shut down job sites

Christopher Morgan, a 36-year-old sheet-metal worker, is currently employedon a construction site building high-rise condos in Liberty Village. Three weeks ago, he started an online petition asking the Ford government to shutter all construction sites, which are usually packed with people. The petition has since received more than 50,000 signatures. Last week, Doug Ford announced that he was shutting down all non-essential construction sites. The definition of essential is broad, though, and any commercial or residential projects that already have a permit will continue. Morgan spoke to Toronto Life about how the government isnt doing enough, where hes washing his hands, and why tradespeople are continuing to work in unsafe conditions.

You started a petition calling for all construction sites to be shut down, but the response from government and industry has been slow. What do you want to see happen?Most of the job sites in Toronto are big, 200 or 300 people. Just down the road from Liberty Village theres a site where theyre still building out of the pit. Theres no way they could have proper washrooms or sanitation. Those workers dont even have a place to eat their lunch. If it was up to me, Id say anything relevant to health care should stay openhospital projects, walk-in clinics. But I dont think a condo or office building is essential right now. If you closed down non-essential sites, you could have more construction workers on the health care projects and get them done faster.

What did you think of Premier Fords announcement last week, to shut down non-essential sites?Its putting a Band-Aid on a shotgun wound. Everything is the same except theyre not starting any new projects.

The construction industry is taking different approaches to dealing with the crisis: some employers have shut down their sites, some have continued as normal. What do you think of the response so far?Ive heard of things at all ends of the spectrum. On some sites, theyre going crazy with preventative measures. Theres hand sanitizer everywhere and theyre policing people to make sure no ones too close to anyone else. Others are the same as ever, with no running water. The washrooms are always dirty, guys stand on the toilet seat in their work boots, caking the seat with dirt. Im sure a lot of guys who are responsible for cleaning the washrooms arent working right now. On those sites, theres nowhere you can wash your hands to eat your sandwich at lunch. Men are grabbing the railings, sharing tools, carrying the same ladder and the same hammer drills. You might not know you have the virus for a week and a half, and youd never think you got it from sharing a hammer drill with someone.

What have things been like on the job for the last month?My job site is still running, and my company issues gloves and masks. Theyve always been good at making sure we have N95s. I was off work from March 13 to April 5 because I started showing symptoms of the virus: my body was aching and I had a fever of 38.2. Five or six other people on my site showed symptoms, too, and they told us we had to stay home. I called Telehealth and they said to monitor the symptoms, and I got better. I honestly think it was just anxiety and stress built up in my body. I had the same symptoms on Sunday night, the night before I returned to site.

What was it like on site when you got back?There are still 100 or so people working thereplumbers, electricians, foremen, elevator guys. Before, when youd go up on a hoist, youd have maybe 20 guys, so close that wed make take him out for dinner first, eh? jokes. Now theyve limited it to one or two people on the hoist, plus an operator. There are hand-washing stations set up with soap and water drums. The waters not clean enough to drinkthey put warning signs all over itbut at least we have somewhere we can wash up before and after we eat.

So you dont think projects like condo towers are essential right now. Thats fair. Why start a petition about it?Construction workers are being forced into situations they shouldnt be in. The construction workforce in Canada is huge, more than 1.5 million people. In Ontario, existing projects have been deemed an essential service. Thats a lot of people going to work. I doubt theyre coming home and sleeping in tents or garages like some of the doctors on the front lines. They could be exposing children and partners. Im just disgusted that the government is making these decisions because they want to make money. I just thought, Theres got to be something we can do. Were just the little guys, the blue-collar workers. Lets use social media.

And did you expect it to garner so much support?At first, I was concerned. I thought, Is this going to jeopardize my job? The second day the petition was up, the president of my union called me. He was on my side. They dont want these sites open either. A lot of people are tripping out. Theyre having a hard time handling whats going on in the world. And for what? To get a condo built faster in Toronto?

I saw a video last week of a construction worker talking to a crew on a site in Etobicoke, telling them they could walk out over unsanitary conditions. Are people doing that?I enjoyed watching that. It was nice to see someone standing up. I hope it inspired people to think, Maybe I shouldnt be going to work. Some builders are saying to construction workers, If you leave now, dont think you can come back here afterwards. Our unions would protect people if they felt unsafe and walked off the job. But every guy I know is still going to work. Theyre afraid of not having a job when this is all over.

What would you say to people who have to choose between their income and potentially getting sick?Thats the main reason I started this petition. The government says to stay home. But people who are working in these essential jobs still have to go to work. I just want Doug Ford to be honest. Just say hes worried about the economy, and thats why hes forcing people to put up drywall in some condo in Liberty Village. What about the people who are new to Canada and doing this work, or the people who just started working as apprentices, or just bought a house? Those people have to go to work and shake and sweat all day with fear, and then lose sleep at night thinking, Did I get it? I know you have to put food on the table and you have to pay for your mortgage or your rent. But its not right.

View original post here:
These people have to go to work and sweat all day with fear: A Q&A with Christopher Morgan, the construction worker petitioning the province to shut...

The extended shutdown of construction sites throughout New York will affect loans, insurance costs and supply availability (Credit: iStock)

Most types of construction in New York have been halted for more than a week, an unprecedented statewide shutdown that presents a slew of financial and logistical challenges for builders.

The potential consequences are manifold as development timelines are stretched indefinitely and workers on projects allowed to continue risk exposure to the coronavirus. While the long-term effects of the suspension remain to be seen, experts say projects will likely take a financial hit when it comes to construction loans, insurance and labor.

Joshua Emory, a principal at Primrose Capital, said the financial pain of construction stoppages most affect projects close to completion. Borrowers that have drawn 90 percent of the loan with three or four months of work left will be facing interest payments on a very large loan balance until the project is done, he noted.

He said some lenders might grant borrowers concessions or interest-payment deferrals, but there is no guarantee.

Those tough conversations are beginning to unfold, he said, and unfortunately we dont have a precedent.

Emory said he expected many lenders and borrowers to find a happy medium, especially for debt funds subject to less regulation than banks.

[Theres] no reason to sour the relationship just because of the site shutdown thats out of the hands of everyone involved, he said.

Jim Fraser, head of commercial real estate finance at Built, which provides software to manage construction loans, said restarting construction work will be costly and, depending on the length of time a project sits, its value could be diminished.

Its one thing if this is short-lived a month or maybe two. Its another thing if this drags on, he said. Its time-sensitive, is the bottom line.

Of the 29,587 construction loans nationwide using Builts platform as of April 6, about 16 percent were affected by government-ordered stoppages related to the pandemic. The affected loan commitment value is more than $4.3 billion.

Fraser said no consensus from lenders has emerged on whether they will respond to affected borrowers, although he pointed to an interagency statement on loan modifications issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as a start.

According to the statement, modifications of loan terms will not automatically categorize changes related to Covid-19 as troubled debt restructurings, a substandard classification that is subject to additional regulations.

When projects across a city, state or region are permitted to resume, they will face another problem: a surge in demand for workers and supplies.

Linda Foggie, head of international real estate and construction consulting firm Turner & Townsends New York City office, said supply of materials could be tight when projects come back online en masse. Projects in the city will also compete for labor and approvals from the Department of Buildings, the Department of Housing Preservation and Development and other agencies.

When we do return, there will be considerable pent-up demand for municipal inspections, she said. There will be many [projects and clients] who will need to mitigate the lost time.

Joe Charczenko, of insurance and surety brokerage Construction Risk Partners, noted that construction insurance prices were already rising before the pandemic. A months-long shutdown of the economy and an impending recession could further contract the insurance market.

I think its going to hurt, he said. What we have is the convergence of a hard market and confusion of how much new work we will have when we turn the spigot back on.

Essential construction in New York includes work on healthcare facilities, utilities and affordable housing, as well emergency construction to stabilize a site. According to the Department of Buildings, as of Wednesday, just over 130 sites had been separately approved as essential by the city, in addition to those exempted by the states sweeping order.

Building Trades Employers Association President Lou Coletti noted that even at these essential sites, his members are seeing a huge drop-off in workers.

Even with taking all the precautions, were getting 20 to 40 percent of the workforce that is showing up for work, he said.

The federal CARES Act extended unemployment benefits to individuals who are typically not eligible, notably independent contractors. Some construction unions, including Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York and Long Island and the New York City District Council of Carpenters, have also started allowing members to tap into their retirement savings.

Unions will have to grapple with a drop in the amount of money being fed into their benefit funds, but Tamir Rosenblum, general counsel at the Mason Tenders District Council, said his organization can withstand the decrease in work.

Its a resilient program, he said. Its not running like an airline, which is out of business after two weeks of this.

Write to Kathryn Brenzel at [emailprotected] and Erin Hudson at [emailprotected]

See original here:
Shutdown poses big risks for projects even when it ends - The Real Deal

Dublin, March 20, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "India Building Construction Industry Databook Series - Market Size & Forecast by Value and Volume, Opportunities in Top 10 Cities, and Risk Assessment" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The building construction industry in India is expected to record a CAGR of 11.2% to reach INR 35,220.8 billion by 2024. The residential construction industry in value terms increased at a CAGR of 11.1% during 2015-2019. The commercial building construction market in value terms is expected to record a CAGR of 12.2% over the forecast period.

This report provides data and trend analyses on building construction industry in India, with over 80 KPIs. This is a data-centric report and it provides trend analyses with over 120+ charts and 100+ tables. It details market size & forecast, emerging trends, market opportunities, and investment risks in over 30 segments in residential, commercial, industrial and institutional construction sectors.

It provides a comprehensive understanding of construction industry sectors in both value and volume (both by activity and units) terms. The report focuses on combining industry dynamics with macro-economic scenario and changing consumer behavior to offer a 360-degree view of the opportunities and risks.

In addition to country level analysis, this report offers a detailed market opportunity assessment across key cities, helping clients assess key regions to target within the city.

Reason to Buy

Key Topics Covered

1 About this Report1.1 Methodology1.2 Definitions1.3 Disclaimer

2 India Construction Industry Dynamics and Growth Prospects2.1 Construction Industry Growth Dynamics2.1.1 India Construction Industry Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20242.1.2 India Construction Markets Snapshot2.1.3 India Building Construction Industry Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20242.1.4 India Infrastructure Construction Industry Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20242.2 Analysis by Building and Infrastructure Construction Sectors2.2.1 Market Share Analysis by Building Construction Sectors, 2015 - 20242.2.2 Market Share Analysis by Infrastructure Construction Markets, 2015 - 20242.3 Trend Analysis of Key Macroeconomic KPIs2.3.1 Economic Outlook - GDP2.3.2 Economic Outlook - GDP per Capita2.3.3 Business Confidence2.3.4 Consumer Confidence2.3.5 Demographics - Population2.4 Global Construction Industry Attractiveness Snapshot2.4.1 Global Construction Industry Hot Spots2.4.2 Global Construction and Real Estate Industry Attractiveness2.4.3 Global Construction Industry Risk Index

3 India Residential Construction Industry Market Size and Forecast3.1 Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20243.2 Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20243.3 Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20243.4 Residential Construction Analysis and Growth Dynamics by Number of Units, 2015 - 2024

4 Analysis by Residential Construction Markets Outlook by Construction type4.1 Snapshot by Residential Building Construction Markets by Construction Type4.2 Multi Family Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20244.3 Multi Family Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20244.4 Multi Family Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20244.5 Multi Family Construction Analysis and Growth Dynamics by Number of Units, 2015 - 20244.6 Single Family Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20244.7 Single Family Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20244.8 Single Family Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20244.9 Single Family Construction Analysis and Growth Dynamics by Number of Units, 2015 - 2024

5 Analysis by Residential Construction Markets Outlook by Key Cities5.1 Snapshot by Residential Building Construction Markets by Key Cities5.2 Tier - 1 Cities Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20245.3 Tier - 1 Cities Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20245.4 Tier - 1 Cities Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20245.5 Tier - 2 Cities Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20245.6 Tier - 2 Cities Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20245.7 Tier - 2 Cities Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20245.8 Tier - 3 Cities Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20245.9 Tier - 3 Cities Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20245.10 Tier - 3 Cities Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

6 Analysis by Residential Construction Markets Outlook by Price Point6.1 Snapshot by Residential Building Construction Markets by Price Point6.2 Luxury Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20246.3 Luxury Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20246.4 Luxury Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20246.5 Luxury Residential Construction Analysis and Growth Dynamics by Number of Units, 2015 - 20246.6 Mid-Tier Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20246.7 Mid-Tier Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20246.8 Mid-Tier Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20246.9 Mid-Tier Residential Construction Analysis and Growth Dynamics by Number of Units, 2015 - 20246.10 Affordable Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20246.11 Affordable Residential Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20246.12 Affordable Residential Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20246.13 Affordable Residential Construction Analysis and Growth Dynamics by Number of Units, 2015 - 2024

7 Residential Building Construction Growth Trend Analysis by Development Stage7.1 Snapshot by Residential Building Construction Markets by Development Stage7.2 New Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20247.3 Re-development Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20247.4 Maintenance Residential Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 2024

8 India Commercial Construction Industry Market Size and Forecast8.1 Commercial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20248.2 Commercial Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20248.3 Commercial Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20248.4 Market Share Analysis by Commercial Building Construction Markets

9 Office Building Construction Outlook9.1 Office Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20249.2 4Office Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 20249.3 Office Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 20249.4 Snapshot by Office Building Construction Markets by Price Point9.5 Grade - A Office Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20249.6 Grade - B Office Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 20249.7 Grade - C Office Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 2024

10 Retail Building Construction Outlook10.1 Retail Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202410.2 Retail Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202410.3 Retail Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

11 Hospitality and Luxury Building Construction Outlook11.1 Hospitality and Luxury Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202411.2 Hospitality and Luxury Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202411.3 Hospitality and Luxury Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

12 Restaurant Building Construction Outlook12.1 Restaurant Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202412.2 Restaurant Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202412.3 Restaurant Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

13 Sports Facility Building Construction Outlook13.1 Sports Facility Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202413.2 Sports Facility Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202413.3 Sports Facility Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

14 Entertainment Building Construction Outlook14.1 Entertainment Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202414.2 Entertainment Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202414.3 Entertainment Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

15 Commercial Building Construction Growth Trend Analysis by Development Stage15.1 Snapshot by Commercial Building Construction Markets by Development Stage15.2 New Commercial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202415.3 Re-development Commercial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202415.4 Maintenance Commercial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 2024

16 India Industrial Construction Industry Market Size and Forecast16.1 Industrial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202416.2 Industrial Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202416.3 Industrial Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

17 Outlook and Growth Dynamics by Industrial Building Construction Sectors17.1 Market Share Analysis by Industrial Building Construction Markets17.2 Manufacturing Plant Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202417.3 Manufacturing Plant Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202417.4 Manufacturing Plant Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 202417.5 Metal & Material Processing Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202417.6 Metal & Material Processing Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202417.7 Metal & Material Processing Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 202417.8 Chemical & Pharmaceutical Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202417.9 Chemical & Pharmaceutical Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202417.10 Chemical & Pharmaceutical Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

18 Industrial Building Construction Growth Trend Analysis by Development Stage18.1 Snapshot by Industrial Building Construction Markets by Development Stage18.2 New Industrial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202418.3 Re-development Industrial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202418.4 Maintenance Industrial Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 2024

19 India Institutional Construction Industry Market Size and Forecast19.1 Institutional Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202419.2 Institutional Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202419.3 Institutional Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

20 Outlook and Growth Dynamics by Institutional Building Construction Sectors20.1 Market Share Analysis by Institutional Building Construction Markets20.2 Healthcare Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202420.3 Healthcare Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202420.4 Healthcare Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 202420.5 Education Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202420.6 Education Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202420.7 Education Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 202420.8 Public Convenience Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202420.9 Public Convenience Building Construction Market Size by Volume, 2015 - 202420.10 Public Convenience Building Average Construction Value, 2015 - 2024

21 Institutional Building Construction Growth Trend Analysis by Development Stage21.1 Snapshot by Institutional Building Construction Markets by Development Stage21.2 New Institutional Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202421.3 Re-development Institutional Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 202421.4 Maintenance Institutional Building Construction Market Size by Value, 2015 - 2024

22 India Building Construction Analysis by Key Cities22.1 Snapshot of Building Construction Markets by Key Cities22.2 Delhi NCR Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.3 Mumbai Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.4 Kolkata Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.5 Bengaluru Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.6 Hyderabad Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.7 Chennai Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.8 Ahmadabad Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.9 Pune Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.10 Surat Building Construction Markets Snapshot22.11 Jaipur Building Construction Markets Snapshot

Companies Mentioned

Story continues

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/67jt7u

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.comFor E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

Continued here:
India Building Construction Industry Analysis 2015-2020 - Yahoo Finance

Issued March 9-13

OFFICE BUILDING: 3306 Kaliste Saloom Road, Lafayette; Donald Paul, owner; description, new office building; Knobbie Langlinais, applicant; Thomson Brothers Construction Inc., contractor; $443,500.

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

SCHOOL/LIBRARY: 301 Dunand St., Lafayette; Northside High School, owner; description, restroom addition; NMF Architecture LLC, applicant; Bulliard Construction Co. Inc., contractor; $90,000.

OTHER: 3605 Ambassador Caffery Parkway, Lafayette; Ambassador Row Courtyard Shopping Center, owner; description, canopy remodel; Tamim El Haje, applicant; Thomson Brothers Construction Inc., contractor; $256,545.

DEPARTMENT STORE: 3617 Ambassador Caffery Parkway, Lafayette; Gulf Coast Commercial Group Inc., owner; description, landlord interior improvements; Samantha Olendorff Arcvision Inc., applicant; Thomson Brothers Construction Inc., contractor; $240,000.

GENERAL RETAIL: 4407 Ambassador Caffery Parkway, Lafayette; Total Wine & More, owner; Thomas A. Hunbenstricker, applicant: Russco Inc., contractor; $1,270,334.

TENANT BUILD-OUT: 1105 Ambassador Caffery Parkway Suite 2, Lafayette; Ambassador Oaks LLC, owner; Kent Design Build Inc., applicant and contractor; $98,000.

COMMERCIAL: 6925 Ambassador Caffery Parkway, Broussard; Fat Pat's, applicant; Chase Commercial Group Construction LLC; $1,350,000.

204 Ridgecroft Drive, Lafayette Parish; Rah Homes LLC; $342,000.

308 Stanwell Ave., Lafayette Parish; DSLD LLC; $184,500.

4837 W. Congress St., Lafayette; Paul Oran Broussard; $423,000.

606 Greyford Drive, Lafayette Parish; BECC Enterprises LLC; $481,500.

110 Tracewood Bend, Lafayette; Shivers Brothers Construction; $270,000.

100 Tasvo Trail, Lafayette; Blue Wing Builders LLC; $459,000.

108 Gentle Crescent Lane, Lafayette; DSLD LLC; $229,500.

200 Amber Pond Lane, Lafayette; Heritage Home Builders Inc.; $319,500.

102 Orchard Park Ave., Lafayette; Home for the Holidays Inc.; $324,000.

724 Rue Des Etoiles, Carencro; HBL Properties LLC; $310,500.

101 Stoney Shadow Drive, Lafayette; Michael Galasso; $387,000.

405 Channel Drive, Broussard; Coastal Custom Builders LLC; $267,730.

See the article here:
Who's building where in Acadiana? Here are the building permits issued March 9-13 - The Advocate