Home Builder Developer, Interior Renovation and Design

While the state government is aiming to see a 20% growth in tourists visiting Gujarat in 2013-14, growth of the number of hotel rooms at popular tourist locations is unlikely to keep pace with tourist inflow growth. Several tour operators in the state say that in the last few years, while there has been a significant rise in interest in Gujarat tourism thanks to the popular campaign Khushboo Gujarat Ki, addition of quality hotel rooms at tourist spots has been slow.

In the longrun, such logistical issues can de-rail the Gujarat government's ambitious plans for tourism growth, say operators. Data from the tourism ministry website shows that from January 2010 to December 2013, around 35 new hotel projects including even bed-and-breakfast inns, totalling around 2,300 rooms have been approved in Gujarat. In comparison, 296 hotel projects have been approved in Kerala, 130 in Maharashtra, 90 in Tamil Nadu, 68 in Uttar Pradesh during the same period.

S Maheswari of Height & Sight Holidays based in Bhuj said, "In the last few years, there has not been many quality hotel rooms added in tourist locations across the state. Major additions have been in cities like Ahmedabad, Vadodara which get business travellers." For that matter, Ahmedabad had seen a huge jump in hotel rooms from 519 rooms in 2006-07 to around 1,975 rooms in 2012.

Another operator, Sharvil Patel who runsAltius Travels, an Ahmedabad-based travel agency and is also a member of the Association of Domestic Tour Operators of India (ADTOI)says that while the Saurashtra region has witnessed a decent growth in the number of hotel rooms in the recent past, in Kutch, however, the process is slow.

Data from theGovernment Information Technology Committee (GITCO)shows that in between April 2011 and April 2013, while cities like Ahmedabad have seen an addition of 2,890 rooms, tourist places like Dwarka have seen an addition of only 26 rooms, Ambaji has seen none, Palitana has actually seen a decline of 25 rooms, Girnar and Somnath have also not seen any room additions. In comparison, 365 rooms have been added at Vadodara, 353 in Surat and 284 rooms in Gandhidham. Even Mehsana and Anand have seen 106 and 137 rooms added respectively during the period as these are close to industrial and commercial centers. Tourist spots like Mandvi (20 rooms), Porbandar(nil), Patan (nil) and Pavagadh (nil) have not seen many hotel rooms getting added to accommodate tourists.

M Vakharia, head of Gujarat chapter of the Outbound Tour Operators of India (OTOI) too admitted that there were logistical issues that could impact the growth of Gujarat tourism in the long run, like long road routes to reach destinations, not many quality rooms at tourist spots. "Infrastructure issues could eventually bring down the number of repeat visitors," he said.

On its part, the state tourism department, is working to improve infrastructure. Tourism Corporation of Gujarat Limited (TCGL) has almost completed the upgradation of the Toran Hotels, with an investment of around Rs 15 crore. Sanjay Kaul, managing director, TCGL said, "We have almost finished the upgradation work of the Toran hotels across the state, a project we had taken up around a year back." He, however, also added that the state government has taken a decision that it would not invest in building hotels and would encourage private investors to set up hotels in Gujarat. "Number of enquiries for putting up new hotel projects has definitely increased in the last few years," he said.

Gujarat had seen a 13.6% growth in the number of tourists visiting Gujarat last year, which was around 25 million.

Read the original post:
New hotel room addition at tourist spots in slow lane

(Three recent news items lead me to republish a post that predated my Boston.com days. The firstis a new study showing that antipsychotics and stimulants can be used together in treatment of aggression associated with ADHD. The second is a recent New York Times article, The Selling of Attention Deficit Disorder, the third an article from today's New York Times: ADHD Experts Re-evaluate Study's Zeal for Drugs. I am hopeful that 2014 will be a year of radical rethinking about what we now call "ADHD.")In the Tony award winning play God of Carnage two couples meet in an elegant living room for an ostensibly civilized conversation about the aggressive act of one couples child against the others. The meeting soon degenerates to reveal the underbelly of conflict in the two marriages. Husband and wife hurl insults, precious items and even themselves with escalating rage. We see, as they attempt in vain to focus on the childrens behavior, the proverbial elephant in the room.

It brought to mind another depiction of the nature of the elephant, presented by the pharmaceutical industry. A recent issue of The Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics features prominently a two page ad from Shire, makers of drugs commonly used for treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). A mother and her son sit at the desk of a doctor in a white coat. Behind them is a large elephant draped in a red blanket on which is printed the words, resentful, defiant, angry. The ad recommends that these symptoms, in addition to the more common symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity, should be addressed. This is the message: doctors should be treating these symptoms with medication.

From my vantage point of over 20 years of practicing pediatrics, where I sit on the floor, not in a white coat, and play with children, I believe that the plays depiction of the nature of the elephant is much more accurate and meaningful than that of the pharmaceutical industry. In the play the elephant is the environment of rage and conflict in which the aggression occurs, while in the ad the elephant is the childs symptom. Consider these two stories from my pediatric practice (with details changed to protect privacy.)

Everything was a battle with six year old Mark. Though I asked both parents to come to the visit, Mom came alone. She was furious.Tell me what to do to make him listen. We had a full hour visit, and as she began to relax, she shared a story of constant vicious fighting between herself and her husband. Mark, who had been playing calmly and quietly, took a marker and slowly and deliberately made a black smudge on the yellow wall. His mother was too distracted by her own distress to stop him. I said, You cannot draw on the wall, but maybe you are upset about what we are talking about. He came and sat on his mothers lap. She reluctantly revealed her suspicion that his angry behavior was a reflection of the rage he experienced at home. She agreed to get help for her marriage, and Marks behavior gradually began to improve.

Janes parents became alarmed when her aggressive behavior began to spill over into school. Her third grade teacher told them that not only was she distracted and fidgety, but she seemed increasingly angry. At our second visit, Dad became tearful as he described his cruel and abusive father. He acknowledged being overwhelmed with rage at Jane when she didnt listen. He yelled at her and threatened her. He longed for a positive role model to learn how to discipline her in a different way. He realized he needed help to address the traumas of his own childhood in order to be a more effective parent for Jane.

If the elephant in the room is the childs symptoms, as the drug companies would have us believe, then medication may be the solution. Children taking medication for ADHD often tell me that it makes them feel calm. The full responsibility for the problem then falls squarely on the childs shoulders.

For Mark and Jane, and countless children like them, the elephant in the room, however, is not the childs symptoms. It is the environment of conflict in which the symptoms occur. If the family environment is the elephant, the treatment of the problem is not as simple as prescribing a pill. Families must acknowledge and address seemingly overwhelming problems. The parents relationship with each other, and each parents relationship with his or her own family of origin, often contributes significantly to this environment.

In the supportive setting of my office, Mark and Janes parents were freed to think about their childs perspective and experience. Rather than focusing on what to do they understood what their children might be feeling growing up in an environment of conflict and rage. This ability for parents to think about their childs feelings has been shown, in extensive research at the intersection of developmental psychology, genetics and neuroscience, to facilitate a childs development of the capacity to manage strong emotions and adapt in social situations.

In another interesting link between this ad and God of Carnage, one of the fathers is an attorney representing a drug company. He speaks loudly on his cell phone, seemingly oblivious to the effect of his behavior on the other people in the room. His conversation reveals the profit motive of the drug company taking precedence over the well being of the patient.

God of Carnage was written by Yasmina Reza, a French playwright. While the play itself is hugely entertaining as a witty farce about family life, an important message was in a brief scene at the very end. The telephone rings. The mother answers. It is her daughter, all upset about the loss of her pet hamster, which the father had set free one night because he was annoyed by the animals habits. Suddenly the mood of the play, which was lively with scintillating dialogue throughout, becomes serene as the mother speaks lovingly to her distraught daughter. Perhaps most of the audience was barely aware of the sudden mood change. Yet it lifted this delightful play into universal significance. Freeing herself from the preceding chaos, she calmly gives her full attention to her daughters experience.

View post:
ADHD, the aggressive child and the elephant in the room